"Offensive" issues
- Thread starter 10_point_buck
- Start date
Husker in WI
All-Conference
Yeah that was ugly, but if it works nobody is questioning it. Not sure how that was supposed to go, seems like Stoll and Jaimes were blocking it like a middle screen but Washington drifted out wide. Or it was supposed to be wide, in which case Stoll just can't let the S/LB waltz past him. And Washington has to catch it, but it wasn't going anywhere if he did.
Not knowing much about the defense and what they expect out of certain looks, I'd give it the benefit of the doubt. If it turns out they hadn't run this since fall camp and that's why it was a mess, it's a bad play call. But honestly if Stoll blocks the guy he ran right past or Washington stays inside, it's there. What would you have run instead?
ActualCornHusker
Starter
You're right, if plays work, the play caller will get a lot of credit, and if they don't, ppl will say that the play call sucked.
The reason I'd consider it questionable is because screens have been really poor all year, and we ran another screen earlier in that drive that also didn't work.
But at the same time, who knows what play would work - this offense has been wildly inconsistent all year.
Husker in WI
All-Conference
Stoll has this guy dead to rights:
Runs right by him instead. This guy shouldn't be there if Stoll blocks him:
Hixson does get to #18, so if that guy is blocked it's Washington 1 on 1 with #25, which is great. Although looking again, #25 makes a mockery of Woodyard's block attempt (probably why he hasn't been on the field), so maybe #6 is supposed to be the one guy for Washington to beat. And there is a ton of room in the middle.
But to your point, screens have not been good all year. Maybe Frost was thinking Minnesota wouldn't expect it because of that, but seeing the ones in the game it is a call that leaves room for criticism. I just don't know if the 4th down call is a drive blown by bad playcalling. We're in 4th and 2 because of bad blocking on 1st down, a receiver tripping on 2nd, and a a lack of power from Washington on 3rd. Those are also factors in the failed drive.
Runs right by him instead. This guy shouldn't be there if Stoll blocks him:
Hixson does get to #18, so if that guy is blocked it's Washington 1 on 1 with #25, which is great. Although looking again, #25 makes a mockery of Woodyard's block attempt (probably why he hasn't been on the field), so maybe #6 is supposed to be the one guy for Washington to beat. And there is a ton of room in the middle.
But to your point, screens have not been good all year. Maybe Frost was thinking Minnesota wouldn't expect it because of that, but seeing the ones in the game it is a call that leaves room for criticism. I just don't know if the 4th down call is a drive blown by bad playcalling. We're in 4th and 2 because of bad blocking on 1st down, a receiver tripping on 2nd, and a a lack of power from Washington on 3rd. Those are also factors in the failed drive.
Last edited by a moderator:
BIG ERN
All-American
I mentioned earlier this year that on crucial downs we run a lot of 1 option plays. Meaning there is really only one place we are looking to go. I am not a fan of these plays in these situations. 3rd n 8 we also ran an inside run with Mo
Last edited by a moderator:
Husker in WI
All-Conference
Yeah, that's fair. Like I said it's definitely a playcall that is open to criticism, even though I don't have a huge problem with it.
It was 3rd and 6 and I'm sure he was planning on going for it on 4th. So that's another one I don't really have an issue with, but I understand some will. If you don't have a 3rd and 6 playcall you're very confident in I'm fine with getting a few and setting up a 4th and 2.
BIG ERN
All-American
Ya I get that. I also feel our spacing on passing plays has been under par all season. MN lined up a ton of times begging us to get 5 yards per pass play.
Husker in WI
All-Conference
For sure. You want a playcall I was pissed at, that fake punt was straight out of coaching 101. We were down, needed a spark, 4th and short between the 40s. Everything about the situation screamed fake, so you might as well line up and go for it instead. Frost said he thinks Minnesota might have seen it coming - that's an understatement, everyone in the stands saw it coming. And even with that, if Allen went left there was a huge lane - I don't know if the blockers were wrong or if he was, but it still could've worked.
ActualCornHusker
Starter
Husker in WI
All-Conference
You're right, so Allen probably is just supposed to go straight ahead. A more experienced ball carrier might have made this work, but if Miller gets his block it's a moot point. Kind of why I just would've gone for it though - they know to expect a fake, and you're asking a TE to run and LBs to block. Let the backs run and the linemen/tight ends block - not that they did that particularly well.
MyBloodIsRed16
All-Conference
Watch it again.. 71 stands around like a fat kid at baskin robbins who can't pick out a flavor. Not Allen's fault
Last edited by a moderator:
ActualCornHusker
Starter
LumberJackSker
All-American
PaulCrewe
Heisman Trophy Winner
Which is basically the same look he has had on like 75-80% of plays this year, and that may be generous
Danimal
All-Conference
There are certainly ways Frost is more handcuffed this season but there are still too many calls that are stupid or overly conservative. Bad screens and trying to force Mo to be physical running him up the gut behind a struggling line come immediately to mind. We need to find ways to get him the ball in space. Not just sneaking the ba!l inside the 1 against a gassed D at the end against Illinois was utterly ridiculous, could have cost us the game if our D doesn't step up.