slacker Team HuskerBoard Jun 25, 2005 #16 Did that quality have to do with a means of communication? Click to expand... Did that quality have to do with a means of communication? YES Last edited by a moderator: Jun 25, 2005
Did that quality have to do with a means of communication? Click to expand... Did that quality have to do with a means of communication? YES
rawhide Team HuskerBoard Jun 25, 2005 #17 The unhired applicants did not speak the same language as the manager?
slacker Team HuskerBoard Jun 26, 2005 #18 The unhired applicants did not speak the same language as the manager? Click to expand... The unhired applicants did not speak the same language as the manager? NO, meaning they spoke the same language.
The unhired applicants did not speak the same language as the manager? Click to expand... The unhired applicants did not speak the same language as the manager? NO, meaning they spoke the same language.
I IrishAZ Five-Star Recruit Jun 27, 2005 #19 Did the means of communication relate directly to the performance of the job for which the candidate was hired?
Did the means of communication relate directly to the performance of the job for which the candidate was hired?
slacker Team HuskerBoard Jun 27, 2005 #20 Did the means of communication relate directly to the performance of the job for which the candidate was hired? Click to expand... Did the means of communication relate directly to the performance of the job for which the candidate was hired? YES
Did the means of communication relate directly to the performance of the job for which the candidate was hired? Click to expand... Did the means of communication relate directly to the performance of the job for which the candidate was hired? YES
slacker Team HuskerBoard Jun 28, 2005 #22 Was the hired candidate bilingual? Click to expand... Was the hired candidate bilingual? YES in a sense.
Was the hired candidate bilingual? Click to expand... Was the hired candidate bilingual? YES in a sense.
I IrishAZ Five-Star Recruit Jun 29, 2005 #23 Were the candidates applying for a job as a translator of some type?
slacker Team HuskerBoard Jun 29, 2005 #24 Were the candidates applying for a job as a translator of some type? Click to expand... Were the candidates applying for a job as a translator of some type? YES in a sense.
Were the candidates applying for a job as a translator of some type? Click to expand... Were the candidates applying for a job as a translator of some type? YES in a sense.
I IrishAZ Five-Star Recruit Jun 29, 2005 #25 The man got the job as a sign language interpreter. The manager called the next candidate using sign language, and he was the only one who responded.
The man got the job as a sign language interpreter. The manager called the next candidate using sign language, and he was the only one who responded.
slacker Team HuskerBoard Jun 29, 2005 #26 The man got the job as a sign language interpreter. The manager called the next candidate using sign language, and he was the only one who responded. Click to expand... The man got the job as a sign language interpreter. The manager called the next candidate using sign language, and he was the only one who responded. NO Warmer
The man got the job as a sign language interpreter. The manager called the next candidate using sign language, and he was the only one who responded. Click to expand... The man got the job as a sign language interpreter. The manager called the next candidate using sign language, and he was the only one who responded. NO Warmer
slacker Team HuskerBoard Jun 29, 2005 #28 Was sign language the communication method? Click to expand... Was sign language the communication method? NO
Was sign language the communication method? Click to expand... Was sign language the communication method? NO
I IrishAZ Five-Star Recruit Jun 29, 2005 #29 When the man who was hired was called, were the other candidates still filling out the forms they were given?
When the man who was hired was called, were the other candidates still filling out the forms they were given?
