Hypocracy is the definition of a fan. To say that Husker fans are more so is easy simply because of the shear number of them. This is Nebraska and for all the good and bad of that Nebraska fans can be a bit diehard. It's not like a West Coast school where everyone in the state is on the band wagaon based on who's winning. It's not like Cubs fans who are diehard fans when their team looses year in and year out only to become excessively critical only when they are winning. This is Nebraska and we are willing to overlook certian real or percieved shortcomings when we win but like all fans can become more critical when we loose. This year has been a bit different. We are critical even when we win. We see potential, we see improvement and we see our wait for a return to former glory as dutyful however even we have limitations. Fans aren't upset because we haven't returned or restored etc. Fans are upset because the see either real or percieved mistakes that the team, staff etc. should not be making at this point. Is that hypocritical or realistic?
Are chiefs fans hypocritical when they give the coach the benefit of the doubt for brining Trent Green back and then after he struggles speek out that the 2nd string guy who's performed well should be starting? I venture to guess there are a few on the KC team that now which the 2nd stringer had the start in the playoff game but that's just a guess.
Are chiefs fans hypocritical when they give the coach the benefit of the doubt for brining Trent Green back and then after he struggles speek out that the 2nd string guy who's performed well should be starting? I venture to guess there are a few on the KC team that now which the 2nd stringer had the start in the playoff game but that's just a guess.