Ok so... what do Starkville and Oxford have that Lincoln doesn't?

So often I hear Nebraska fans use the "geographically disadvantaged" excuse. Starkville and Oxford are just two more examples of places where kids are willing to go, due to the respective programs having excellent coaches and recruiters.

 
Apparently attempts to discredit "geographically disadvantaged" excuse.

Gives two examples of programs who have a huge geographic advantage.

 
If you think Oxford or Starkville have anything even remotely close to what's available in Lincoln, you are sadly mistaken. Mississippi is no hotbed of talent, either.

 
If you think Oxford or Starkville have anything even remotely close to what's available in Lincoln, you are sadly mistaken.
If you think what's available to do in a town anywhere close to being the biggest advantage in location, you are sadly mistaken.
Mississippi is no hotbed of talent, either.
As compared to where? Nebraska?
recruiting-distribution.0_standard_730.0.jpg


Ya they're pretty close

 
Nebraska was ranked #5 after five games in 2010. Being highly ranked early in the season isn't that difficult. Let's see where they're ranked at the end. My guess is quite a bit down the ladder.

 
[if you think what's available to do in a town anywhere close to being the biggest advantage in location, you are sadly mistaken.]

I certainly don't, but that's the excuse I've heard for years from the mouths of Nebraska fans. "Oh, there's nothing to do here" "It's too cold" etc.

 
What's funny is this....

These same disadvantages existed six years ago, and our facilities were worse

The previous coach landed classes that embarrass Bo's

 
Nebraska was ranked #5 after five games in 2010. Being highly ranked early in the season isn't that difficult. Let's see where they're ranked at the end. My guess is quite a bit down the ladder.
MS State has beaten 3 straight Top 5 teams. Their schedule is brutal. That's the ONLY reason why they might not finish high in the polls. If we had their schedule we'd finish with a losing record.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nebraska was ranked #5 after five games in 2010. Being highly ranked early in the season isn't that difficult. Let's see where they're ranked at the end. My guess is quite a bit down the ladder.
MS State has beaten 3 straight Top 5 teams. Their schedule is brutal. That's the ONLY reason why they might not finish high in the polls.
Neither LSU nor Texas AtM are "Top 5 teams." They're barely top 25 teams. That's the problem with early polls.

 
Nebraska was ranked #5 after five games in 2010. Being highly ranked early in the season isn't that difficult. Let's see where they're ranked at the end. My guess is quite a bit down the ladder.
MS State has beaten 3 straight Top 5 teams. Their schedule is brutal. That's the ONLY reason why they might not finish high in the polls.
Neither LSU nor Texas AtM are "Top 5 teams." They're barely top 25 teams. That's the problem with early polls.
I am willing to wager that both LSU and A&M finish higher than Nebraska in the final polls.

 
Back
Top