On the Bright Side....

Bye Bye Big XII said:
JJHusker1 said:
Bye Bye Big XII said:
JJHusker1 said:
krc1995 said:
and a&m may lose worse then we did. Not that I really care who wins that game but at least were not the only ones to shat our pants on national tv.
Click to expand...
Getting schooled by #1 is quite a bit different than our usual MO. Heck, A&M might drop all the way to #11.

Us on the hand.........
Click to expand...
Getting schooled by #1 when you're #6 is about the same as getting schooled by #16 when you're #23.
Click to expand...
Sure, sure it is.

A&M will still be talked about.

Sportscasters and the media will snicker if Nebraska ever gets mentioned.

Same=Same?
Click to expand...
I know they're not the same. But from a purely rankings look at it: If you're #6, you're better than #23. You obviously have better talent and have been performing better thus the higher ranking. Now, you're playing #1 and #16 respectively. The difference in the rankings is roughly the same, so both games should be pretty tight. But that hasn't been the case. A&M and Nebraska are both getting (or got) schooled by a team ranked the same amount higher than them.

No, I know A&M will still be ranked and we won't. But just saying.
Click to expand...
How is this even comparable? A&M battled back and had a chance to win. Bama's ground game was just too good. They didn't get waxed like we did.

 
On the bright side, Mac Brown is on the hot seat while Ole Miss is clobbering them after BYU dismantled them. Oh yeah it's getting real up in here.

 
I'll throw out another. Oracle USA won a race against the Kiwi's today before the second was called off, meaning Oracle only needs 9 more wins before the Kiwi's get 3 if we're to retain the America's Cup.

 
EbylHusker said:
I'll throw out another. Oracle USA won a race against the Kiwi's today before the second was called off, meaning Oracle only needs 9 more wins before the Kiwi's get 3 if we're to retain the America's Cup.
Click to expand...
Ummmmm......WHAT???

 
walksalone said:
Imani Cross averaged 6.3 yards per carry...
Click to expand...
Yes but UCLA was running defensive alignments that didn't call for Imani? Or what was that crazy stupid excuse? I never heard something so dumb in my life! Isn't the defense supposed to adjust to stop the offense. Instead we are letting their defense dictate to us? Someone please explain this to me.

 
True to the Red.......Always said:
walksalone said:
Imani Cross averaged 6.3 yards per carry...
Click to expand...
Yes but UCLA was running defensive alignments that didn't call for Imani? Or what was that crazy stupid excuse? I never heard something so dumb in my life! Isn't the defense supposed to adjust to stop the offense. Instead we are letting their defense dictate to us? Someone please explain this to me.
Click to expand...
It would appear you, unlike Bo and Beck, do understand it already.

 
JJHusker1 said:
True to the Red.......Always said:
walksalone said:
Imani Cross averaged 6.3 yards per carry...
Click to expand...
Yes but UCLA was running defensive alignments that didn't call for Imani? Or what was that crazy stupid excuse? I never heard something so dumb in my life! Isn't the defense supposed to adjust to stop the offense. Instead we are letting their defense dictate to us? Someone please explain this to me.
Click to expand...
It would appear you, unlike Bo and Beck, do understand it already.
Click to expand...
How many times did we run Ameer up the middle? But I guess Imani isn't suited for that.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top