muffler dragon
Four-Star Recruit
Understood, and thanks for sharing. I highlighted "cooperative", because I believe this is the most simplistic, yet complete descriptive of the Big Ten. In all things, it's a cooperative. The success of the Big Ten academically and athletically comes from the universities being unified. I would think that that would be a selling point to a program that feels like a lesser presently.It's definitely lack of seeing the big picture. Most of the people unhappy with the move focus on football, and specifically the Big 10's perceived strength at this moment. It's a case of not being able to see past your nose - all thoughts are about the here and now, this moment in time. People have discussed Michigan as being "weak" and the conference overall as weak.
Oddly, in those same threads you'll find people saying we can't compete in the Big 10 - basically saying it's a weak football conference, but we're not good enough to be successful, despite the fact that we just competed in our own conference's championship game and came damned close to winning. Clearly these arguments aren't based on much logic, but a lot of emotion.
Further, I have yet to see a poster who is against this move address the economic benefits to Nebraska, both in BTN money and CIC grants. And nobody at all is discussing how the cooperative nature of the CIC will necessarily benefit Nebraska academically.
While there are arguments against joining, they're not well-thought-out and they're mostly based on emotion, and adherence to the past.
I would imagine that there would be an explosion of facilities/renovations in quick order.I would say its a fear of going into the unknown. Sure there are risks, but i would say it is riskier to stay in a doomed conference. Its time to look out for #1 and I believe our program is to stable to faulter no matter where we end up. The Big10 will make us gobbs of money, I can only imagine what we are going to be able to do with an extra 20-30 million a year.
Delany's initial public announcement regarding expansion was in December. He has stated recently that there were talks within prior to that.Wasn't Delany's announcement just two or three week ago? I am thinking this started must have started behind closed doors long ago. I guess it doesn't really matter, but I am curious. Is it possible that Dr. Tom, fed up with Texas's bullying, planted the seed that started all of the reallignment chain of events? You know in the end, Dr. Tom will always win. I very much admire how he plays his hand.
Re: TO's role, I would say that most (if not all) administrators and universities outside of the Big Ten had a very small role in bringing about Big Ten expansion. The Big Ten brass are very methodical, and don't take steps like this lightly.