Tonights Sky
Walk-on
Anyone seen a clip of that sack?
Squeaky clean. Hard to see this drawing a suspension, IMO.It's in the highlights. Look at 2:54.
http://www.huskers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=205021455&DB_OEM_ID=100
Looks clean to me.
EDIT: that should have been a fumble recovery for a TD.
Weren't we saying this last week? Martin's hit was "cleaner" than this as Osborne clearly contacts Gabbert's helmet with his own helmet.Squeaky clean. Hard to see this drawing a suspension, IMO.It's in the highlights. Look at 2:54.
http://www.huskers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=205021455&DB_OEM_ID=100
Looks clean to me.
EDIT: that should have been a fumble recovery for a TD.
I disagree. Some angles made it look like Martin's helmet was the first part of his body that made contact with the victim. Also, Martin had several aggravating factors not present here:Weren't we saying this last week? Martin's hit was "cleaner" than this as Osborne clearly contacts Gabbert's helmet with his own helmet.Squeaky clean. Hard to see this drawing a suspension, IMO.It's in the highlights. Look at 2:54.
http://www.huskers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=205021455&DB_OEM_ID=100
Looks clean to me.
EDIT: that should have been a fumble recovery for a TD.
But it's a QB.I disagree. Some angles made it look like Martin's helmet was the first part of his body that made contact with the victim. Also, Martin had several aggravating factors not present here:Weren't we saying this last week? Martin's hit was "cleaner" than this as Osborne clearly contacts Gabbert's helmet with his own helmet.Squeaky clean. Hard to see this drawing a suspension, IMO.It's in the highlights. Look at 2:54.
http://www.huskers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=205021455&DB_OEM_ID=100
Looks clean to me.
EDIT: that should have been a fumble recovery for a TD.
1) He left his feet to make the hit
2) The player never saw him coming
3) He flexed/celebrated after making the hit
4) He was seen laughing about something on the sideline
5) They victim was down on the carpet for a long time
Now, I personally think all of these factors are irrelevant and should not have resulted in a suspension. But to old men in suits who feel compelled to show they are not going to be soft on "vicious hits," these factors were more than enough to pull the trigger.
More importantly, none of those factors are present for Osborne's hit.
But it's a QB.I disagree. Some angles made it look like Martin's helmet was the first part of his body that made contact with the victim. Also, Martin had several aggravating factors not present here:Weren't we saying this last week? Martin's hit was "cleaner" than this as Osborne clearly contacts Gabbert's helmet with his own helmet.Squeaky clean. Hard to see this drawing a suspension, IMO.It's in the highlights. Look at 2:54.
http://www.huskers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=205021455&DB_OEM_ID=100
Looks clean to me.
EDIT: that should have been a fumble recovery for a TD.
1) He left his feet to make the hit
2) The player never saw him coming
3) He flexed/celebrated after making the hit
4) He was seen laughing about something on the sideline
5) They victim was down on the carpet for a long time
Now, I personally think all of these factors are irrelevant and should not have resulted in a suspension. But to old men in suits who feel compelled to show they are not going to be soft on "vicious hits," these factors were more than enough to pull the trigger.
More importantly, none of those factors are present for Osborne's hit.