had this not been uncovered, Tom would not have said anything....what else is being hidden?Not OK. Just dealt with.So because Tom knew about this a year ago it suddenly makes everything okay?
I'm failing to see the logic here...
had this not been uncovered, Tom would not have said anything....what else is being hidden?Not OK. Just dealt with.So because Tom knew about this a year ago it suddenly makes everything okay?
I'm failing to see the logic here...
Not said anything to whom? He talked with Bo and it was dealt with. Unless you were higher up the chain than Tom...had this not been uncovered, Tom would not have said anything....what else is being hidden?Not OK. Just dealt with.So because Tom knew about this a year ago it suddenly makes everything okay?
I'm failing to see the logic here...
Harvey perhaps but I'm not sure about Eichorst. I don't think you'd go through every situation you've been through with each coach. Unless you had reason to believe they might have to deal with it, which they didn't.Yeah, woah. I completely glossed over this in my first reading, but Osborne didn't tell Harvey about this until after it came out on Monday, a year after he 'dealt' with it privately with Bo.
What an incredibly awkward situation to put Harvey & Shawn Eichorst in as this became a full-blown public hoopla, and they're just finding out that they should have already known about it.
Every human who says butthurt is............(figure that out genius). Anyway that was fast simple teaching you probably won't learn from. Grow up.I can't believe people are butthurt because Tom took care of this as soon as he was made aware of it while he was till the AD and didn't tell the masses.
Well, put me down as one of those "dull fans" I guess.
Even with the blowouts, I don't see a need to fire a coach that probably wins 10 games or more this year. Even if we don't make it to a CCG or lose that one again.
The most I expect is: At the end of the year pressure is brought to bear on the coordinators, and some changes are made there. Or new faces in other areas.
When we are winning this much, I think we are better served by analyzing the blowouts and doing what we can and should to make them go away. Obviously we are usually beating the average teams. We need to figure out what is keeping us from winning the big ones.
Do we still employ a sports psychologist like Jack Stark in the 90's? If so, that person may need to improve their work, or we may need additional input on the psych side.
It's a complex organization, and it could be one relatively minor part that causes a problem to magnify into other seemingly unrelated areas. We have a lot of well paid experts on board. If they can't sort it out in 3-5 years, then I'll be ready to change the entire staff and take the inherent risks that are associated.
Or I would clearly understand it's from an incident before I was in the position of AD at Nebraska. I can't see where Eichorst would be confused about it happening and being dealt with prior to his hire.Maybe. If I were in Eichorst's shoes and this came up on Monday, and then I get a call saying "Oh don't worry, we already knew about this and dealt with it" I'd be extremely confused for a while.