Maryland could end up having a great sports program with all that Under Armor cash. Oregon wasn't all that great 15-20 years ago, and now look at it.I honestly can't stand the thought of adding more than 2 more. I mean clearly every Husker fan wants Oklahoma. However, I have the oddest feeling that the Big 10 will end up with Kansas, and another East school.
If Oklahoma State is tied to Oklahoma so tight then I don't see the Sooners ever being in the Big 10, and they will probably get eaten up by the SEC.
I really don't mind the addition of Maryland. However I will never like the addition of Rutgers. I think it's a huge miss. I know this crap is about money and tv markets and all that, but it just really bothers me because of competitiveness. Rutgers just doesn't seem right to me.
I agree, but with bigger conferences the true rivalries do develop its just not in a cross division fashion.Personally, I think the league is too big already. If we add more, there will be even less continuity and more time between playing the headliners of this league.
Less is more IMO. That's how traditions and rivalries are built. How do you establish a rivalry, or anything resembling one, when you only see a team every 4-6 years? By the time you play them again, you're checking Google to see what the score of the last game was.
I also think its weird when I see people who loved the Big 8 days then go on to talk about 16-20 team leagues?
KU wants nothing to do with any of the other schools in kansas. except for the lower division ones. need someone to pad their basketball record with, and they get to say they are "helping" out the smaller schools to boot.OU and OSU are tied together no matter what, but I don't think the same is true of KU and KSU. Could be wrong though.
Boom. Roasted. I like where your mind is at.Personally, I love the move to the B1G and would never want to go back to the Big 12. Even though I like where we are at, i do feel we are kind of in a transition period in the conference. We are too big to play everyone in reasonable number of years. But, we aren't really big enough to have two clear cut divisions that play in a championship without the possibility of a rematch.
Therefore, i could see a scenario with 20 teams that I would like. I could see the pod system as mentioned above. That gives us even more variety in games played than we have now. Potentially, we would have 8-9 teams that are different from the previous year. I would like that.
I could also just see two 10 team divisions with 9 conference games and the only cross division game would be the CCG. This would have the feel of the old Big 8 but the benefits of a larger conference with TV deals and a CCG.
Then, if more conferences go to the 20 teams, we sort of automatically have added a good scenario for the first round of the playoffs. The CCG.
I was on the Ducks board yesterday asking about the foxsports article and what they've heard and/or are hearing.East: Ohio St, MSU, Michigan, Penn St, Purdue, Indiana, Maryland, Rutgers
West: Nebraska, OU, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Kansas, Northwestern, Illinois
Please make this happen Jim Delaney. I say the Pac12 can have the disease known as Texas.