huskerfan2000
Banned
Rankings are just that rankings and based on those rankings our top players (outside of Watson) didn't play like top players are supposed to play. Is that because of a lack of coaching, or is it because they were not as good as recruiting "experts" claimed.. time will tell on both.I'm arguing that he just went good good back to back years. I'm also saying that he took transfers to fill the gaps that needed to be filled. Yes he had control however the smaller class of 3 and having transfers were the better option. You are starting to crack me up with your desire to pick and choose small parts of peoples statements and using blurry vision to make them say things that weren't said.If you want to argue that the order has to specifically be good, bad, bad, I think you're missing the forest for the trees."would seem to fit the pattern that was brought up - One good year and a couple bad ones" isn't what was said
what was said was "one good class followed up by a couple poor ones". How is our current class poor? it is the second best class based on 247 player rankings in the last 10+ years with the only one better being the previous class of Miles. That gives us the best two classes in a row.... How is that poor?
You can say that about the transfers and some agree or disagree with the use of transfers, however we are very young with talent and adding some upperclassmen talent seems like a wise choice in this case. It also keeps us from having back to back classes with 5 guys which would seem to be a little unbalanced - I believe 3 or 4 a year is the norm.
And I don't mind grabbing transfers. It's basically the norm in college basketball now-a-days. But your statement about Miles having no control over the smaller class sizes was demonstrably false. He could have chosen to not take any transfers and only take high school players.
Tim could very well change his previous M.O. on how his teams have done, since he has everything he could possible need at NU. So far, he is trending exactly the same.. bad years then a good one or two.
I shouldn't have been so specific with my original post, I should have left it at his overall records. His overall records at each school have been basically the same.. bad years then a good one. Hopefully, he can change that here, but Tim, going into his 5th year, is sitting at .500
Last edited by a moderator: