Passenger DUI

slacker

Team HuskerBoard
Irregular News for 08.03.06

Carlisle, PA -- A Pennsylvania man is fighting a DUI charge, on the grounds that he was in the passenger's seat.

A state trooper said Derek Pittman had reached over and was steering the car while the driver was taking a bite of a sandwich that he was holding in both hands.

The trooper said the car was weaving on the road before he pulled it over. He said he then noticed a strong odor of alcohol coming from the car and saw the driver holding a large sandwich with both hands. So he gave Pittman a field sobriety test and he failed.

The trooper said the alcohol odor wasn't coming from the driver; it was coming from Pittman. Records show that when the trooper asked the driver why the car was swerving, Pittman leaned across the front seat and told the trooper it was his fault because he had briefly held onto the steering wheel while his friend was taking a bite of his sandwich.

Pittman's attorney said the driver never took his hand off the steering wheel, so the charge should be thrown out.

Police said the driver passed a breath test, but the passenger had a blood-alcohol content nearly three times the legal limit for driving in Pennsylvania. The Associated Press earlier reported that the driver was not given a sobriety test, but later corrected that statement.

Court records show that the first district judge refused to sign the original arrest warrant for Pittman.

"I don't believe there is probable cause to believe Mr. Pittman was in actual physical control of the vehicle," the judge told the trooper in a note, according to The Patriot News.

The paper said the district attorney's office then petitioned for permission to ask another district judge to sign an arrest warrant. And in February, a different district judge signed the second warrant.

A hearing is scheduled later this month in Cumberland County Court over the Dec. 26 incident.

source

 
Last edited by a moderator:
ok AR give us your opinion on this one. I think the distric atty is wasting time and taxpayers money on this one. maybe he should have charged the driver with reckless driving.

 
I don't see how they would have any physical evidence as to who had control of the wheel. Its all he said/ she said stuff.

 
Yeah basically, but if the passenger admitted to grabbing the steering wheel then the officer could get him under his statements. I know under Iowa law just sitting behind the wheel of the car while it is running and in park is considered control of the vehicle. I arrested a lady for drunk driving for that once.............yeah yeah yeah it's a long story to explain!!! chuckleshuffle

 
ok AR give us your opinion on this one. I think the distric atty is wasting time and taxpayers money on this one. maybe he should have charged the driver with reckless driving.
Interesting case. The key is the phrase "actual physical control". That's the standard for most states for DUI cases. Most states have rules that "actual physical control" means more than the ability to stop an automobile; it means the ability to keep from starting, to hold in subjection, to exercise directing influence over, and the authority to manage.

In my opinion, the passenger, by having his hands on the steering wheel of a moving car, was able to exercise directing influence over the car. He could have jerked the wheel and plowed into another car, a pedestrian, a building. Certainly, I think the intent of DUI laws are such that they contemplate protecting the public from a hazard produced by someone in control of a vehicle while not in possession of their facilities due to drugs or drink.

Let me put it this way - it's been a looooong time since I was a prosecutor or prosecuted a DUI. But I'd have no problem at all in taking this case to a jury.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah basically, but if the passenger admitted to grabbing the steering wheel then the officer could get him under his statements. I know under Iowa law just sitting behind the wheel of the car while it is running and in park is considered control of the vehicle. I arrested a lady for drunk driving for that once.............yeah yeah yeah it's a long story to explain!!! chuckleshuffle
I know a few people that got a DUI for sitting behind the wheel even the though the car was not on and the keys were not in the ignition. I still don't know how that is possible but they were arrested for it.

 
I know in Iowa the vehicle may not have to be on, but it helps your case that much more if it is!!! I didn't want to arrest her, but she didn't give me a choice. I called her a cab and she had the cab drop her off at her car (which I though she would) and then got behind the wheel. When she opened the door 3 or 4 beer cans fell out of the car. This was at our casino here in Des Moines. She blew a .230!!! :angry:

 
Back
Top