np_husker
Starter
Shatel: Pelini gave Castille chances
http://www.omaha.com/article/20090824/SPOR...773/0/FRONTPAGEI applaud Bo Pelini’s disciplinary stance on Quentin Castille. But I also like to know what I’m applauding.
So I asked Pelini after Monday’s Nebraska football practice if he could expound on his decision to dismiss Castille from the team on Saturday. At the time, Pelini said Castille had not followed team policy and pretty much left it at that.
As a journalist, I wanted more. I wanted Pelini to shed some light on his thought process. I didn’t expect him to disclose which rule Castille broke. He’s going to protect his player. And coaches see team matters as private. That’s understood.
But I was curious: What would a veteran player — and one with a significant impact on the coming season — have to do to get the boot two weeks before the season?
Does Pelini owe us that explanation? No. He was hired to win football games, graduate players, be a role model and win football games.
But I want to learn more about this young head coach, at the dawn of what should be a long career. What are his philosophies? How is he going to run this program? In the ’90s, Nebraskans knew Tom Osborne like the back of their hand. What do we know about Pelini? I’m interested in peeling back a layer.
I wasn’t alone. I received calls and e-mails from several readers who felt Pelini, as a head coach of a public institution, and their favorite team, should explain himself. They see two players who ran afoul of the law in the last year reinstated and ready to play. What did Castille do not to be afforded the same opportunity?
One reader said he was concerned Pelini was a “hothead’’ who just fires players at will. Another wondered if Pelini would have standards too high to win championships; while other national powers find a way to give troubled players chances.
There is a plan. There is a thought process. And Pelini gladly shared it on Monday.
• On whether Castille was given more than one chance to turn things around: “Yes. He had many chances. I’m pretty black and white, and I’m pretty clear with our football team about what’s expected. I think the communication is good. You lay out exactly what the expectations are, you take the gray out of it. And you’re either going to do it or, I’ve said it before, I’m going to show you the door.’’
• On whether players such as Niles Paul and Andy Christensen are under similar scrutiny now: “Yes. Unfortunately, in (Castille’s) case, he did not live up to what he was told. He went against policy. It’s pretty cut and dried. I can’t make decisions based on what’s good for our team short-term. I’m making decisions based on what my vision is for this program as we move forward, this year and beyond this year. I’ve got to be worried about the big picture, too.’’
• On whether he’s concerned that he might be giving up an edge to other programs who give multiple chances to players in order to compete for championships:
“I believe I’m very fair. I think everybody’s a little different. I’m not only concerned about whether we win or not, I’m concerned about how we do it. And my job is not only to win football games, it’s to prepare our guys for the rest of their life. I believe that from the bottom of my heart, and sometimes to do that, it means you’ve got to give them a wake-up call. Whether every coach in the country believes that, I don’t care. They can run their program the way they want it. I’ll run mine my way. If ultimately some day it costs me my job, I can look in the mirror.
“I can tell you this: I have an athletic director who is wholeheartedly behind me. And that’s good.’’
I applaud Pelini even more now. And it’s good to know why.