How does a coach exhibit very high integrity in all areas of the operation of his university and still be able to split hairs on what Sandsusky was doing, condone what he did by allowing him to retire with a great benefit package, cover up the crimes and lie about it? (He KNEW. Nothing happened at the school remotely connected to football that he did not know about and direct.)
My suspicion is that it had something to do with his absolute authority. There was no one who could challenge any decision of his. But what did he tell himself?
My suspicion is that it had something to do with his absolute authority. There was no one who could challenge any decision of his. But what did he tell himself?