The article was good up until:
If he had a bad moment – and it’s possible this occurred the way Naughright’s lawyer suggested it did – he has, on balance, had exponentially more good moments. I’ve never felt you judge someone based on one of the worst, if not THE worst, moment of their lives.
Unless, you know, they murdered someone or did something else that could be deemed unforgivable.
Again, this happened 20 years ago, when he was still a teenager.
Starting to get really sick of these writers saying it's okay since he was young, or that it was a locker room prank. Again, IF he did it, he then went on to ruin her career 8-9 years later based on lies, out of revenge, at the "young" age of 27.
Sometimes this stuff is forgivable if the person shows remorse or pays the penalty for it. IF he did it, he has done neither of those things.
The author wrote a bunch of good stuff and then decided to be an idiot, just like the fox sports guy.