Poll: Should Frost be fired?

Should Frost be fired at the end of the season?

  • Yes, Frost should be fired.

    Votes: 76 43.9%

  • No, Frost should be allowed to stay.

    Votes: 97 56.1%
  • Total voters
    173
Guy Chamberlin said:
Do you honestly believe people thinking for themselves can't arrive at a variety of conclusions? 

45% is a pretty large number. No doubt a lot of the 55% remain concerned. I'm among the latter.

Some people claim they've seen all they need to see. Most still have questions that may or may not be answered in the next four games. Won't know who's right for awhile, if ever. 

I'd say it's been a pretty valid discussion all around. 

If we took a poll about whether ndobney adds to or detracts from every discussion, you might not like those numbers. 
Click to expand...
That's a completely incoherent response. Clearly I said in the comment that I still wanted to see more at some point improvement needs to start translating to wins. 

Actually forget it speak to me when your competent seriously. Read more than the first line before you respond that way you can avoid over reaction.

 
Guy Chamberlin said:
Do you honestly believe people thinking for themselves can't arrive at a variety of conclusions? 

45% is a pretty large number. No doubt a lot of the 55% remain concerned. I'm among the latter.

Some people claim they've seen all they need to see. Most still have questions that may or may not be answered in the next four games. Won't know who's right for awhile, if ever. 

I'd say it's been a pretty valid discussion all around. 

If we took a poll about whether ndobney adds to or detracts from every discussion, you might not like those numbers. 
Click to expand...
I mean you literally made the same argument as I did. I said people overreact after games we lose and was just pointed that out you than literally said and I quote. Most still have questions and won't know for a while. Which I said the same thing but at some point we need to start winning.

You said the exact same thing I said different and then bashed me for not adding anything to the conversation. Meaning that if I add nothing you add less for saying after me.

Can't even describe that logic. I'm just going to call that a Guy Chamberlin

 
Hedley Lamarr said:
My take is Frank never should have been given the reins in the first place. 
Click to expand...


Yes, and the situation was exacerbated significantly by TO hamstringing Frank by not wanting him to hire and fire as he saw fit. When Frank finally did it anyway after the crappy '02 season it was against the urgings of TO and McBride. 

 
I am still in the boat that Frank solich would have worked out Had he been given the proper amount of time with Bo Pelini as his defensive coordinator. Now Bo more than likely would have moved on as well as some other assistant coaches. However, I think Frank eventually would have picked up Scott Frost as an offensive coordinator / coach in waiting. And it would have worked out just fine

 
Hedley Lamarr said:
My take is Frank never should have been given the reins in the first place. 
Click to expand...
I disagree.  I have no problem with Frank taking over. However, TO should have allowed him to bring in his own staff as he sees fit….just like any other new head coach.  

 
Kentmick said:
He beat the teams of lesser talent. When I look at his losses. Early on, we may have had more raw talent and lost to more experienced teams but we took care of business. The issue was our talent graduated for the most part after 2001. We didn't have the coaching to coach around our lack of talent. 

It sure was nice beating the teams we were supposed to beat.
Click to expand...


Well you beat teams of lesser talent because you have better talent. You're expected to beat teams when everyone knows you're a good team. And Frank Solich's 1999, 2000, and 2001 teams spent most of their time in the Top 5. The worst of those three teams played for the National Championship. The best of those teams was 12-1 and finished #3, having beaten the #5, #6, #12, #18 and #21 teams in the country. 

The P5 game may have started to pass Solich by, but my saying three out of Frank's five seasons would have fit near the top of Tom Osborne's resume is a stone cold fact. No revisionist history required. 

It's also likely that by 2002, college football itself had caught up with Nebraska, and the team no longer enjoyed the advantages that made our 40 year run possible and incredibly hard to duplicate. Maybe this isn't the curse of Solich, just the odds catching up.

Some of our younger posters may not remember how Husker fans totally s#!t the bed over Frank Solich's 7-7 recored in 2002.

 
ndobney said:
That's a completely incoherent response. Clearly I said in the comment that I still wanted to see more at some point improvement needs to start translating to wins. 

Actually forget it speak to me when your competent seriously. Read more than the first line before you respond that way you can avoid over reaction.
Click to expand...


Read these two sentences again. Slowly. 

Then get back to me about incoherent. 

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top