Prophetic comments from last season

I see the logic behind what you guys are proposing, but the idea of a fleet of DB sized players trying to bring down Le'veon Bell makes me nervous as hell.
Based on the tackling in the first two games, I would be nervous as hell regardless of who is in the game. The athleticism of UCLA made us pay for the mistackles, but there was plenty of horrible tackling against Southern Miss.
lol...yeah, I guess you've got a point there.

 
HA! Well I was trying to stay away from guys that we haven't seen play, otherwise I would probably have thrown Charles Jackson, Michael Rose, David Santos, and Mo Seisay in there as well.
I see the logic behind what you guys are proposing, but the idea of a fleet of DB sized players trying to bring down Le'veon Bell makes me nervous as hell.
You can't tackle the guy if you can't catch him. I would also prefer to be nervous that something bad might happen than be almost certain that something bad will happen.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
HA! Well I was trying to stay away from guys that we haven't seen play, otherwise I would probably have thrown Charles Jackson, Michael Rose, David Santos, and Mo Seisay in there as well.
I see the logic behind what you guys are proposing, but the idea of a fleet of DB sized players trying to bring down Le'veon Bell makes me nervous as hell.
You can't tackle the guy if you can't catch him.
Yes. I would agree that physical contact is a definite requirement in tackling.

Wait. Niles Paul. God..........dammit.

 
Lets face it, like him or not Raymond was right. This may be the slowest and most unathletic defense I've ever seen in my 33yrs as a Husker fan. There's obviously a problem here that needs to be addressed.
how so.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It starts upfront. Yes our LBs are not the fastest and have been doing a terrible job of tackling, but it starts up front. Our front 4, are terrible. They can not get any pressure what so ever. They are slow and weak and just eat up space. Ucla did not have the most dominate o line, but they made us look like middle schoolers. Eric Martin is too small, Ankrah is too busy getting fed sugar cubes by the o line, and baker is/ was the most overhyped, overrated player on our entire defense. The holes that Franklin had to run through we're enormous and then our sh**ty LBs had to try to solo tackle him, and we all know who wins that battle. Hundley had 10 seconds in the pocket every passing down, and when no one was open he had wide open space to scramble because our spy couldn't keep up with him. The problem lies up front, of we had pressure on hundley consistently, they would have had 400 yards of offense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You're just hangin' on Corey Raymond's junk these days, aren't you?...
Huh? Not at all. I defended his comments last year from the stand point of them being correct. (never liked him as a hire) Wrong way to get it out ie to the media, but hind sight being 20/20 the guy was spot on. We always say "we don't see what the coaches see" and here is/was a guy that was a coach and made the comments. It probably hastened him to LSU, but it was glaring last night that roughly 66% of our D stunk and he saw a glaring lack of talent. I give the DB's a pass last night. They played well under the circumstances IMO.
I agree with you, and as Igetbored216 said above, the problem is more with the front 7. I'm almost to the point where I'd like to see this line-up:

---------- Ankrah--------- Meredith ---------- Caveman -------------

Green-------------------------------------------------------Evans----------------Jean-Baptiste

---------Cooper -------- PJ Smith --------- Compton ----------- H. Jackson

-------------------------------- Stafford---------------------------------

I'm not huge on the 3-4, but we don't have the LB/DL talent right now and we have lots of depth in the secondary.
You think they suck against the rush now, wait till you see that line up. That is a 3-4 with 3 DBS. That is more like a 3-1-7. I really don't see how putting less size on the field makes you better at tackling. May get faster, but teams with decent line play will gash that alignment. I do think getting some new blood in the mix will help though.

 
You're just hangin' on Corey Raymond's junk these days, aren't you?...
Huh? Not at all. I defended his comments last year from the stand point of them being correct. (never liked him as a hire) Wrong way to get it out ie to the media, but hind sight being 20/20 the guy was spot on. We always say "we don't see what the coaches see" and here is/was a guy that was a coach and made the comments. It probably hastened him to LSU, but it was glaring last night that roughly 66% of our D stunk and he saw a glaring lack of talent. I give the DB's a pass last night. They played well under the circumstances IMO.
I agree with you, and as Igetbored216 said above, the problem is more with the front 7. I'm almost to the point where I'd like to see this line-up:

---------- Ankrah--------- Meredith ---------- Caveman -------------

Green-------------------------------------------------------Evans----------------Jean-Baptiste

---------Cooper -------- PJ Smith --------- Compton ----------- H. Jackson

-------------------------------- Stafford---------------------------------

I'm not huge on the 3-4, but we don't have the LB/DL talent right now and we have lots of depth in the secondary.
I'm guessing what you're saying is there's maybe a good reason to throw in a 3-4 right now, correct? Because, it would definitely get rid of one bad Dlineman, and you could put a couple slower but bigger LBers in the middle, and put faster DB/LBs in the OLBer roles. I'd put Williams or VV in the middle of the Dline though. Meredith is too slow, and def too small for the middle. Then basically fill in with our normal secondary. It may sound crazy, but I think we could play a 3-4, and actually have a better chance. I've actually said a few times, with the way we seem to be recruiting, I could see us switch to a 3-4 in the future.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I realize the patented Pelini "Peso" defense is not exactly the same as a 3 - 4 scheme, but we essentially did play the Peso format throughout much of last season. Then Bo came out and essentially said that we weren't ready for the transition from covering spread offenses to the power offenses of the B1G, as a reason for the drop-off in defensive play.

I just don't buy his excuse. Both the Peso and what we're doing now require lightning speed from whatever players are behind our line (be it LBs or DBs) when your line just stands their blocker up. We had to shoot to the gaps, and we had to have fast LB play. We had that in 2010 especially.

Also, one issue that seems to fly under the radar a bit is our complete unwillingness to blitz. I swear, I feel like our LBs don't even have a feel for blitzing, even if we were to use it more often.

 
HA! Well I was trying to stay away from guys that we haven't seen play, otherwise I would probably have thrown Charles Jackson, Michael Rose, David Santos, and Mo Seisay in there as well.
I see the logic behind what you guys are proposing, but the idea of a fleet of DB sized players trying to bring down Le'veon Bell makes me nervous as hell.
Our current D will be fine against Le'Veon because the Spartan offense is as unathletic as our defense. We can stop a traditional offense that has a decent pocket passer, which is why we'll be fine against MSU and Wisky. We're going to need a lineup like this against Michigan and OSU to have any chance of winning those games. If we don't make a change, Braxton and Denard might get 650 yards by themselves.

 
Back
Top