I can't vote in this poll with those options, I still think we need to wait and see for abit. I was fine with getting rid of him after the Iowa debacle combined with everything else that happened last year. The problem I have with firing him, is we are still likely to be a 9 win team with the perception being that we are better than last year (whether true or not, I'm unsure). You have to have a good guy to come in here if you are going to get rid of the staff. The problem I have with forcing him to get rid of Papuchis and/or Beck, a new OC/DC needs to bring in his own people, and then you would have practically an entire staff not picked by Pelini, what was the point then of having Pelini? I do think we have a lot of good Position coaches here. I think the forcing Beck to run Oregon's offense has been a failure, I don't think it is natural for him, and I also am unsure that offense is a good fit for Nebraska. Our offense should be more like Minnesota or OSU than Oregon (more physical, traditional style). I think beck would be more comfortable in a more pass heavy, zone read to keep them honest offense. Defensively, Things were good for Pelini's first three years. However, starting with Texas in 2010 and Washington part deux 2010, I saw teams taking a certain approach that seemed to expose some schematic flaws. Those things have seemingly only been getting worse since then, and it seems we have been making all sorts of changes to try to keep this from happening but after this many years with this many different players, I really think the scheme has seen its days and there is something fundamentally wrong and exploitable and it comes down to gap responsibilities and position reads. I'm not smart enough to really know exactly what it is, but something about the combination of things that are crucial to the system and unable to be changed.