I find it tough to believe they are going to throw in a "new" starter against Washington. I also find it tough to believe Martinez isn't going to get significant PT after the way he played Saturday AND if he keeps up the intensity in practice.We start a different QB every game
That's the part I don't get either. What the heck did Lee do last year that has so many convinced that he SHOULD NOT have to deal with competition at his position? My God, we were HORRIBLE on that side of the ball last year. Even in some parallel universe were he did play well last year, he "still" would have to earn it this year.This is what the next week is going to be like on this board? Listen...Lee doesn't fit the direction this offense is going, to put it simply. He's not a decisive (or overly fast) runner, and that makes the zone read option a lot less effective. If you don't have a threat at QB on that play, it's just a very obvious handoff from a shotgun set...not an effective play. Bo wants to run the ball, and it appears he wants to be able to run it from many different looks...including the spread option type of looks. If Lee doesn't add anything to that type of system, what good does it do to start him just because he's a senior?
I think the depth chart tonight at QB shows that Bo was looking for the player who best fit this system. We will have about a 60/40 run/pass ratio this year, if not higher. If that means we need to get the best athlete out there at QB, great. Martinez obviously did something right in camp, because he's the guy the coaches chose to start the opener.
I'm especially fond of the guys who really think that there's no way we can win the big 12 or even a MNC with Martinez/Green at QB...like Lee really did anything last year to make people believe he's got a better chance to do get us there. Do you really think if he gave us a better chance to win, he'd be 3rd string? Our coaching staff has its faults, but they are not stupid. They did what they think is best for the team.
This season will be brutal for the fans if we have to listen to the "Zac Lee got screwed" camp complain all year long.
I'm a bit hazy on the timeline of events, but here's what I have...If you recall in a previous thread Bo stated that Lee missed out on alot when he missed spring ball. What i took from that was he was flat out not ready. And if Green and Martinez had improved they would pass him, which they did.
Nobody said Lee deserved not to have to deal with competition. I think I said before that regardless of how far ahead he was of the other QBs, with the way his play went last year, he was just in a position where he HAD to know he was in a competition and nothing was going to be given to him.That's the part I don't get either. What the heck did Lee do last year that has so many convinced that he SHOULD NOT have to deal with competition at his position? My God, we were HORRIBLE on that side of the ball last year. Even in some parallel universe were he did play well last year, he "still" would have to earn it this year.
I think his point, more or less, was the way you come off. When trying to prove a point, it doesn't do well for your stance to immediately disregard what anybody else thinks. It makes you come off as pompous and arrogant.Im not claiming to know more. I just dont think we can be as successful against top notch teams with this type of O
In Spring, the T-Magic name surfaced and some of the players were talking about his speed. After the Spring game, people went a little ape "you-know-what".I'm a bit hazy on the timeline of events, but here's what I have...If you recall in a previous thread Bo stated that Lee missed out on alot when he missed spring ball. What i took from that was he was flat out not ready. And if Green and Martinez had improved they would pass him, which they did.
1. Lee missed spring ball, but Cody could not step up and grab the job by the horns, when he was given that opportunity. I don't remember hearing about Taylor much back then. Someone can fill me in on Taylor's standing at that point.
2. Lee returned over the summer and was healed up and sharp.
3. All three quarterbacks had strong fall camps.
4. Lee was supposedly the frontrunner, and Martinez was (apparently) running with the 3's, from practice pictures where he was handing off to Collins Okafor.
5. Martinez missed a practice for reasons unknown.
6. Martinez shot up the depth chart. (Where's Green been all this time? #2? I'm not sure). Lee winds up all of a sudden completely out of consideration, while Martinez is supposedly just a little ahead of Green.
I'll give you a couple of my reasons for thinking Lee gives us a better chance to win than Martinez.That's the part I don't get either. What the heck did Lee do last year that has so many convinced that he SHOULD NOT have to deal with competition at his position? My God, we were HORRIBLE on that side of the ball last year. Even in some parallel universe were he did play well last year, he "still" would have to earn it this year.This is what the next week is going to be like on this board? Listen...Lee doesn't fit the direction this offense is going, to put it simply. He's not a decisive (or overly fast) runner, and that makes the zone read option a lot less effective. If you don't have a threat at QB on that play, it's just a very obvious handoff from a shotgun set...not an effective play. Bo wants to run the ball, and it appears he wants to be able to run it from many different looks...including the spread option type of looks. If Lee doesn't add anything to that type of system, what good does it do to start him just because he's a senior?
I think the depth chart tonight at QB shows that Bo was looking for the player who best fit this system. We will have about a 60/40 run/pass ratio this year, if not higher. If that means we need to get the best athlete out there at QB, great. Martinez obviously did something right in camp, because he's the guy the coaches chose to start the opener.
I'm especially fond of the guys who really think that there's no way we can win the big 12 or even a MNC with Martinez/Green at QB...like Lee really did anything last year to make people believe he's got a better chance to do get us there. Do you really think if he gave us a better chance to win, he'd be 3rd string? Our coaching staff has its faults, but they are not stupid. They did what they think is best for the team.
This season will be brutal for the fans if we have to listen to the "Zac Lee got screwed" camp complain all year long.
Then all the endless whinning, sobbing, conspiracy theories, etc.....anything and everything that can possibly be dreamed up. Wow, it's really something.
Two things I thought about this game. First, most of Martinez's passes were good. However, one of the passes later in the game on a hook route to Paul has A LOT of potential to turn into a pick 6 if you're not careful. Hell, it was almost intercepted, and it would have been had the corner read the player sooner and gotten in there quicker.I'll give you a couple of my reasons for thinking Lee gives us a better chance to win than Martinez.That's the part I don't get either. What the heck did Lee do last year that has so many convinced that he SHOULD NOT have to deal with competition at his position? My God, we were HORRIBLE on that side of the ball last year. Even in some parallel universe were he did play well last year, he "still" would have to earn it this year.This is what the next week is going to be like on this board? Listen...Lee doesn't fit the direction this offense is going, to put it simply. He's not a decisive (or overly fast) runner, and that makes the zone read option a lot less effective. If you don't have a threat at QB on that play, it's just a very obvious handoff from a shotgun set...not an effective play. Bo wants to run the ball, and it appears he wants to be able to run it from many different looks...including the spread option type of looks. If Lee doesn't add anything to that type of system, what good does it do to start him just because he's a senior?
I think the depth chart tonight at QB shows that Bo was looking for the player who best fit this system. We will have about a 60/40 run/pass ratio this year, if not higher. If that means we need to get the best athlete out there at QB, great. Martinez obviously did something right in camp, because he's the guy the coaches chose to start the opener.
I'm especially fond of the guys who really think that there's no way we can win the big 12 or even a MNC with Martinez/Green at QB...like Lee really did anything last year to make people believe he's got a better chance to do get us there. Do you really think if he gave us a better chance to win, he'd be 3rd string? Our coaching staff has its faults, but they are not stupid. They did what they think is best for the team.
This season will be brutal for the fans if we have to listen to the "Zac Lee got screwed" camp complain all year long.
Then all the endless whinning, sobbing, conspiracy theories, etc.....anything and everything that can possibly be dreamed up. Wow, it's really something.
More experience generally means less errors. If our running game, defense, and special teams are very good, then our QB needs to not let the other team have easy chances due to turnovers. My fear is that Martinez will have a game like the ISU game Lee had last year. Lee's already experienced that and should be better prepared for it than Martinez. Imagine what would have happened in the OU game if we'd have turned the ball over.
The other reason is based simply on the idea that Lee is a better passer. I think we get more out of a passing QB than with a running QB. Simple as that. Especially with the talent and experience we've got at receiver this year.
Now that's just my opinion and certainly doesn't mean that it's true.
Lee had a few snaps at the end of the game running with guys he hasn't really worked with all camp.I know exactly what you mean. The funny thing is, Martinez isn't supposed to be the better passer, but he was way more accurate than Lee tonight.
Martinez had the luxury of being anointed the starter, and he still made some pretty bad throws if I'm not mistaken. Of course I only have the highlights so I haven't seen any of them and can only go by the radio call. But these are completely non-comparable situations. The only players we had the opportunity to compare in-game today were Taylor and Cody.