And you don't remember Martinez doing the same thing to BK earlier in the game?All i remember is Carnes rolling out of the pocket and rifling a 15 to 20 yard ball on the money, that was close to the sideline. I don't carer who you are throwing against, that is impressive. I think he has all the potential in the world to unseat Martinez if he picks up the playbook well enough.
Neither those who "believe" he will rip off those runs nor those who "believe" he won't have anything to go on. Nobody knows how his body will heal. He may pick up against TennChatt where he started last year against W. Kentucky, or he may never have that top gear available again.Honest question for the Taylor diehards:
Do you believe Taylor will once again be in a position where he is consistently ripping off +50-yard runs a la WKU, Washington, and K State? Serious question here.
Put differently, I guess I am wondering whether you guys believe Taylor has settled into a place where he may get shorter runs with his feet on a fairly regular basis, but that the long runs we saw in the early part of the 2010 season are largely a thing of the past, or believe he will pick up right where he left off at K State. Now, before you answer, I think a Taylor who is a threat to pick up 5-10 yards with his feet is still a dangerous quarterback.
For my part, I believe that much of the "Martinez mystique" which lead to the Heisman buzz and Freshman All American was a product of those highlight-reel runs, and I further believe that those are almost entirely a thing of the past, both because Taylor may never regain and maintain 100% health and because defenses from this point forward are acutely aware of that possibility.
I am honestly curious whether those of you who believe Martinez is and will remain the starter have that mindset because you truly believe he will still be ripping off those sensational runs in 2011 and beyond, or have that mindset even though you've resigned yourself that those sensational days are pretty much behind him.
The last part is actually why I'm asking. I have no idea whether you, Saunders, or the other guys who believe in Taylor (note I do not mean this in a derogatory way) would fall into #1 or #2. Similarly, I bet you and Saunders would have put in me in #3, but I am tempted by #2.You can't answer that question, because you have no idea how he's going to heal. The answer will only come six games into the season after we've played Washington, Wiscy and Ohio State and have some time to look at the results. Without that foreknowledge every single answer is pure speculation. How could you support your answer?
You can guess #1, and say we saw what he did healthy last year, and healthy this year he should be the same.
You can guess #2, presuming that he develops other quarterback-like skills so that, despite his never-quite-healed lower extremities (for argument's sake), he succeeds.
You can guess #3, presuming that he won't heal properly and never regains his former speed and doesn't develop other quarterback-like skills.
Each answer is completely unsupportable, rife with caveats.
I'd love to give you an answer, Hujan, but my palantír is at the shop.
Interesting thing, though - the answer one gives (if one dares to give an answer) will more reflect the personal feelings they have for Martinez than any actual fact. Based on past conversations I'm sure most of us could answer for most of the rest of us, presuming we've been paying attention and not just typing at each other.
knapplc can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe his point is that he has no idea about Martinez' recovery and neither do the rest of us. Therefore it's unfair to base any assumption.The last part is actually why I'm asking. I have no idea whether you, Saunders, or the other guys who believe in Taylor (note I do not mean this in a derogatory way) would fall into #1 or #2. Similarly, I bet you and Saunders would have put in me in #3, but I am tempted by #2.
Maybe I could attack it from another angle: Would the Taylor fans still be Taylor fans if, hypothetically speaking, you knew that those long runs were a thing of the past? In other words, take away the regular +50-yard runs, do you still buy into the Martinez Mystique?
If you say "no," then your support of Taylor depends on his ability to make those long runs with his feet. If you say "yes," then you believe there is more to him than his ability to make those long runs. And that was what I am trying to isolate, I guess.
I promise there isn't some "Aha!" thing waiting around the bend for those of you who answer that question.
I really think you guys are over-thinking this. It's pretty straight-forward:knapplc can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe his point is that he has no idea about Martinez' recovery and neither do the rest of us. Therefore it's unfair to base any assumption.The last part is actually why I'm asking. I have no idea whether you, Saunders, or the other guys who believe in Taylor (note I do not mean this in a derogatory way) would fall into #1 or #2. Similarly, I bet you and Saunders would have put in me in #3, but I am tempted by #2.
Maybe I could attack it from another angle: Would the Taylor fans still be Taylor fans if, hypothetically speaking, you knew that those long runs were a thing of the past? In other words, take away the regular +50-yard runs, do you still buy into the Martinez Mystique?
If you say "no," then your support of Taylor depends on his ability to make those long runs with his feet. If you say "yes," then you believe there is more to him than his ability to make those long runs. And that was what I am trying to isolate, I guess.
I promise there isn't some "Aha!" thing waiting around the bend for those of you who answer that question.
And your hypothetical situation makes the argument kind of pointless because it is purely hypothetical. Hypothetically speaking how good would we be if Tom Osborne was still coaching? You can answer that question but it doesn't make for good argument unless you're just trying to have fun.
Personally I'm not sure it's fair to deal in hypotheticals in this type of situation unless you don't really want an honest answer.
Martinez is who he is because of his speed and the long runs he had early in his career. Not his arm, not his mechanics, not his pocket presence - none of that. Without those runs early in the year he's not the Martinez people remember today, and it's as simple as that.I really think you guys are over-thinking this. It's pretty straight-forward:knapplc can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe his point is that he has no idea about Martinez' recovery and neither do the rest of us. Therefore it's unfair to base any assumption.The last part is actually why I'm asking. I have no idea whether you, Saunders, or the other guys who believe in Taylor (note I do not mean this in a derogatory way) would fall into #1 or #2. Similarly, I bet you and Saunders would have put in me in #3, but I am tempted by #2.
Maybe I could attack it from another angle: Would the Taylor fans still be Taylor fans if, hypothetically speaking, you knew that those long runs were a thing of the past? In other words, take away the regular +50-yard runs, do you still buy into the Martinez Mystique?
If you say "no," then your support of Taylor depends on his ability to make those long runs with his feet. If you say "yes," then you believe there is more to him than his ability to make those long runs. And that was what I am trying to isolate, I guess.
I promise there isn't some "Aha!" thing waiting around the bend for those of you who answer that question.
And your hypothetical situation makes the argument kind of pointless because it is purely hypothetical. Hypothetically speaking how good would we be if Tom Osborne was still coaching? You can answer that question but it doesn't make for good argument unless you're just trying to have fun.
Personally I'm not sure it's fair to deal in hypotheticals in this type of situation unless you don't really want an honest answer.
What I am asking is whether those that think T-Magic is the best man for the job are saying that because of his supposed ability to break long runs on a regular basis, or whether it is mostly because of other aspects of his game (i.e., ability to lead the team, make critical throws, etc.).
All I'm looking for, really, is for those who think he's the guy, how much weight are you placing on his speed and ability to make long runs? 90%? 70%? 40%? It's really not hypothetical at all. When you evaluate Taylor, how much of his value to the team do you attribute to his ability to make those long runs? Simple. Boom. Done.