Ranking: Rivals v. Scout

Rivals sucks, Scout is better
default_insertsarcasm.gif


 
We are 15 if you average all 4 sites with 12 4 star recruits.... like 247 composite does, even with rivals dragging us down.

 
One thing I've noticed as I have followed recruiting ... stars don't matter when you get a player that has few stars ... and when you get the player with stars ... that is all that matters. :-)

 
I prefer sites like 247 that average a number of sites together. The is no way one site can be the expert on every player in the country. Heck even with all the sites, kids get missed.

 
i guess ive just gotten used to Rivals and scout with Rivals being my go to.. .however it seems rivals (well all of the services) have biases and switch things around to suit their agenda... ive gotten into 247 but i dont really like the layout.....

 
Creighton Duke said:
kchusker_chris said:
this is the first time I can remember in a long time that Scout has had us above Rivals. Scout always seems to screw us.
Click to expand...
Screw us how?
Click to expand...
Just in general seems like our guys are always ranked lower on Scout. Nothing specific. Plus, we've had small classes for some time - and Scout is almost entirely based on the size of the class. I mean, there is no way Alabama doesn't have a better class than LSU...but scout is going w/ LSU

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top