strigori
All-American
In fact Oregon is the only team to play in a national title game in the last 10 years, that did not have a 5 year composite ranking in the top 10. There was a point where I was in the camp of not caring about rankings. Now there is just too much evidence to ignore them. Its not just one site, there are now four major players, so getting a solid composite ranking works very well.Scoobydoesit said:There are a number of things that go into winning football, not just recruiting. Calahan could recruit, but not coach and we all know what happened there. However, the old saying "Its all about the Jimmies and the Joes" does stand up under a test. Look at the last 10 national championship teams, All had very good recruiting classes, based on STARS, prior to winning ,Some had multiple great classes and almost all of them have had fantastic coaches. Many of these teams are loaded with 4-5 start players Even if they get great return on just 50% of their 4-5 star players, its a win ... The proof is in the results.. Heck Auburn, a darkhorse national champion last year has had over 50 4-5 star players in their last 4 classes. I am sure there are examples to support either side as far as STAR power, but this may be Bo's worst class so far. Not saying it is devoid of talent because there are a few in here that will be beasts.. However, this class is less impressive" on paper" than his earlier classes resulting in blowout losses and losses to Iowa, Minnesota etc etc.. . In contrast, how many 30 point losses does Nick Sabin have in the same time frame. ??
Teams that under perform their recruiting, fire their coach. Auburn is the best example. 3 wins to 12 wins overnight by replacing the coach. Texas drove out Mack Brown for the same reason. USC, same story.
Unfortunately we are ending up right about where our recruiting rankings saw we will, at the bottom, or just outside, the top 25.