Recruits

np_husker

Starter
I posted this in another topic, but thought it was such a good article that it might deserve it's own spot on our little board...

BY MITCH SHERMAN

WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITER

LINCOLN - We interrupt the normal path of this column to try bringing a morsel of sensibility to the perception of football recruiting at Nebraska.

In the wake of Southern California's disposal of the Huskers on Saturday night at Memorial Stadium with a couple of dozen recruits on hand to watch as NU continued to sit many of its most promising prospects on the bench, there seems no better time to ask: At what point is it fair to say the bubble has burst on recruiting hype at Nebraska?

Going on 45 months now, we've heard about the ability of coach Bill Callahan and his staff to lure superior talent to Lincoln.

Presumably, that talent was going to make a difference on the field.

Sure, the Huskers look more athletic. They run faster in practice. But why, on a night like Saturday when NU trailed 42-10 after three quarters, did Rickey Thenarse, Keith Williams, Quentin Castille and Niles Paul continue to sit?

In the stands Saturday night sat running back Jonas Gray, another high-profile NU recruit. Gray, from Southfield, Mich., accepted the Huskers' scholarship offer in August.

He offered an intelligent analysis of the game, saying the Huskers lost it in the trenches. Two third-quarter interceptions killed momentum, Gray said, and the disparity in rushing yards (313-31) secured victory for USC.

Still, he said he enjoyed his visit.

"If anything, I came away from it higher on Nebraska," he said. "I'm excited about the future. Seeing what I saw, it makes me like the school and the team that much more. The atmosphere at Nebraska is definitely the best."

Gray said he's planning to come back - if not this weekend, then next month for the Texas A&M game and in December for the team banquet.

As for next year, Gray remains optimistic about his chance to play, even with Marlon Lucky and Cody Glenn scheduled to return as seniors.

"They told me the best player will start," he said, "and the best players will be on the field."

Sounds logical. Look across the field, where USC on Saturday played plenty of freshmen and sophomores, including true freshman center Kristofer O'Dowd. O'Dowd, an all-everything recruit last year, seemed to do just fine.

The past four years would indicate Gray may not get the same opportunity. Particularly at running back, since the start of last season, playing time from week to week for young players has proven erratic.

And consider this: The top five Callahan-recruited players, based solely on performance at Nebraska, are Zac Taylor, Terrence Nunn, Brandon Jackson, Maurice Purify and Cortney Grixby.

Taylor was less touted than another NU quarterback recruit, Harrison Beck. Nunn didn't get as much recruiting attention as Chris Brooks. Jackson's commitment received smaller headlines than Marlon Lucky's. Grixby was less touted than Zack Bowman and Andre Jones.

Aside from Grixby, a serviceable cornerback who's started 30 games, no defensive player recruited by Callahan out of high school has started more than three.

Somewhere along the way at Nebraska, a disconnect developed between potential and performance.

NU may cry foul here, but wrongly so. The Huskers fuel the propaganda by enabling those who operate recruiting Web sites to trumpet their recruiting success. Essentially, Nebraska wants the hype.

At some point, though, there comes a time when performance is all that matters. Maybe Saturday was a start.

We now return to regularly scheduled recruiting hype.

 
We will probably hear some type of excuse from the apologists. That is their biggest boast about Callahan.....his recruiting. At some point he has to answer to the results which are not better in the last 3 years. If his recruits are so great...Why aren't they on the field and performing?

Answer: Coaches

 
We will probably hear some type of excuse from the apologists. That is their biggest boast about Callahan.....his recruiting. At some point he has to answer to the results which are not better in the last 3 years. If his recruits are so great...Why aren't they on the field and performing?

Answer: Coaches

I don't know how you can say the reason they're not on the field performing is all due to coaches. There are a lot of recruits that simply don't pan out. Randy Stella and David Horne come to mind. I agree that the recruits have been overly hyped. I'm guessing that the reason they're not on the field is because they're not as good as the leftover Solich recruits. If these hyped up recruits were worth their salt, I have no doubt in my mind that they would be in the game playing. However, just look at the heralded class BC brought in from a few years ago. They ranked high, but the reason they ranked high was because of a few select players that aren't even on the team anymore.

 
We will probably hear some type of excuse from the apologists. That is their biggest boast about Callahan.....his recruiting. At some point he has to answer to the results which are not better in the last 3 years. If his recruits are so great...Why aren't they on the field and performing?

Answer: Coaches

I don't know how you can say the reason they're not on the field performing is all due to coaches. There are a lot of recruits that simply don't pan out. Randy Stella and David Horne come to mind. I agree that the recruits have been overly hyped. I'm guessing that the reason they're not on the field is because they're not as good as the leftover Solich recruits. If these hyped up recruits were worth their salt, I have no doubt in my mind that they would be in the game playing. However, just look at the heralded class BC brought in from a few years ago. They ranked high, but the reason they ranked high was because of a few select players that aren't even on the team anymore.
Well, since we fired Solich for leaving the program with no talent why are his recruits better than Callahan's? Also, Coaches make players better from High School to College. They don't just get better on their own.

Players not getting better: Coaches fault

Players overhyped: Poor scouting by coaches

Players leaving: Coaches fault

Coaching in at least 80% of player development. How else do they learn and get better?????????

 
We will probably hear some type of excuse from the apologists. That is their biggest boast about Callahan.....his recruiting. At some point he has to answer to the results which are not better in the last 3 years. If his recruits are so great...Why aren't they on the field and performing?

Answer: Coaches

I don't know how you can say the reason they're not on the field performing is all due to coaches. There are a lot of recruits that simply don't pan out. Randy Stella and David Horne come to mind. I agree that the recruits have been overly hyped. I'm guessing that the reason they're not on the field is because they're not as good as the leftover Solich recruits. If these hyped up recruits were worth their salt, I have no doubt in my mind that they would be in the game playing. However, just look at the heralded class BC brought in from a few years ago. They ranked high, but the reason they ranked high was because of a few select players that aren't even on the team anymore.
Well, since we fired Solich for leaving the program with no talent why are his recruits better than Callahan's? Also, Coaches make players better from High School to College. They don't just get better on their own.

Players not getting better: Coaches fault

Players overhyped: Poor scouting by coaches

Players leaving: Coaches fault

Coaching in at least 80% of player development. How else do they learn and get better?????????
If Stella could put down the weed he would be playing in the NFL now.

 
We will probably hear some type of excuse from the apologists. That is their biggest boast about Callahan.....his recruiting. At some point he has to answer to the results which are not better in the last 3 years. If his recruits are so great...Why aren't they on the field and performing?

Answer: Coaches

I don't know how you can say the reason they're not on the field performing is all due to coaches. There are a lot of recruits that simply don't pan out. Randy Stella and David Horne come to mind. I agree that the recruits have been overly hyped. I'm guessing that the reason they're not on the field is because they're not as good as the leftover Solich recruits. If these hyped up recruits were worth their salt, I have no doubt in my mind that they would be in the game playing. However, just look at the heralded class BC brought in from a few years ago. They ranked high, but the reason they ranked high was because of a few select players that aren't even on the team anymore.
Well, since we fired Solich for leaving the program with no talent why are his recruits better than Callahan's? Also, Coaches make players better from High School to College. They don't just get better on their own.

Players not getting better: Coaches fault

Players overhyped: Poor scouting by coaches

Players leaving: Coaches fault

Coaching in at least 80% of player development. How else do they learn and get better?????????
If Stella could put down the weed he would be playing in the NFL now.
Very true, the thing is every school has situations like these. Ask OU who their QB was supposed to be last year. You never expect every recruit to pan out but ours never really seem to get better.

 
With every class you're going to get a mix of those that are underhyped and overhyped. Some players step up, some players wash out. That's just the nature of transitioning from high school to D-1. For every Lucky there's a Jackson. (That's not to say I've completely given up on Lucky, but I don't think he's shown us anything but one brilliant game––and equal fault can be given to the O-line).

 
I agree but other than Jackson who has really shown improvement or is playing at their recruitment level? Everyone talks about how McKeon and Ruud have actually gotten worse. That tells me coaching is the issue.

 
Could it be a trust issue with younger players? They might have more raw talent, make bigger plays, but also make more mistakes? Who knows the answer? Nobody does.

 
Back
Top