You jest but there is a grain of truth to your comment. Unfortunately it has come down to A) Play for Nebraska in the Big Ten and be a legend and a starter. B) Go to the SEC and be a backup but hey you will likely still get a dozen rings. I wish we could re-establish that nasty mentality and edge on defense where kids would foam at the mouth at the thought of becoming a Blackshirt.Those players go to the SEC and play second and third team there. Just joking with you Redux. But they seem to have them to spare and come at you in waves. Maybe we have a hidden one here, will just have to wait and see.
I thought that about last year's defense. But that didn't happen really..I hope people don't judge the UCLA performance as an indicator as how the rest of the year will become. I'm of the opinion that this defense will get better as the season goes along.
This.If a defensive coordinator can pick one spot on his defense to be the strongest part, it would be DT. Pressure up the middle, especially with only a four man rush like Suh could create, is a defense maker. A DT like Suh makes everyone around him look better.If we could just get a couple guys on defense with the sheer monster ability of Suh, and the mentality of the Peter brothers we could get our defense to rally around them and make the whole unit better.
I know Suh was great, but often people don't realize how beneficial it was that Suh was a DT. He could have been the greatest LB, greatest Safety, Or greatest LB ever in the game, it would not have had the impact that it had on that entire unit. A lot of those guys that played behind him can thank Suh for their success.
Baker going down doesn't help much.I thought that about last year's defense. But that didn't happen really..I hope people don't judge the UCLA performance as an indicator as how the rest of the year will become. I'm of the opinion that this defense will get better as the season goes along.
We may have still lost the CCG even with Baker, but it wouldn't have been nearly as embarrassing imo.Baker going down doesn't help much.I thought that about last year's defense. But that didn't happen really..I hope people don't judge the UCLA performance as an indicator as how the rest of the year will become. I'm of the opinion that this defense will get better as the season goes along.
This year's defense, at least on paper, has more raw talent and potential. That said, I'm expecting medicority even as the season progresses. They'll have bright spots, but they'll also have consistency issues and get exposed by the better teams. Given the lack of depth and inexperience, though, I think that's to be expected.I thought that about last year's defense. But that didn't happen really..I hope people don't judge the UCLA performance as an indicator as how the rest of the year will become. I'm of the opinion that this defense will get better as the season goes along.
I'm expecting the defense this year to feel like our offense in 2010. Baring injuries there will be a lot of highs but equally as many growing pains.This year's defense, at least on paper, has more raw talent and potential. That said, I'm expecting medicority even as the season progresses. They'll have bright spots, but they'll also have consistency issues and get exposed by the better teams. Given the lack of depth and inexperience, though, I think that's to be expected.I thought that about last year's defense. But that didn't happen really..I hope people don't judge the UCLA performance as an indicator as how the rest of the year will become. I'm of the opinion that this defense will get better as the season goes along.