MichiganDad3
All-American
On the replay that overturned the call on the field and gave wiscy a TD, the OL was blatantly holding a defender.I'd be curious to see stats on holding penalties by team in the Big Ten in conference play.
On the replay that overturned the call on the field and gave wiscy a TD, the OL was blatantly holding a defender.I'd be curious to see stats on holding penalties by team in the Big Ten in conference play.
We got a ton of calls our way today. I cannot and will not complain about the refs. We were sloppy at times and got called out. Thats ok. There were plenty of plays where we stole a bad call.
Wisconsin does a great job of "holding within the interior of the defender". Sometimes if the defenders work harder and make an effort to release themselves from the hold, the holding becomes apparent to the referees. I think they also get the benefit of the doubt from the refs as they are known for being a great o-line.Maybe the outcome wouldn't have changed, but an additional 7-10 points would have helped the psyche of our team tremendously. You could remove 14 points off the board for Wisconsin if the proper call was made on them. I don't know how a team gets away with some much hands to the face, and offensive line holding.
That game looks totally different with decent officiating. Crazy things can happen in close games. If nothing else it makes them throw more.There were bad calls but lets be honest, the refs didn't cost Nebraska the game last week
You're right. Did you see that blatant facemask on Gifford? I think the clip is floating around twitter. It was bad.Wisconsin does a great job of "holding within the interior of the defender". Sometimes if the defenders work harder and make an effort to release themselves from the hold, the holding becomes apparent to the referees. I think they also get the benefit of the doubt from the refs as they are known for being a great o-line.
How is this not PI on #43 Wisconsin?
![]()
The receiver is also within 5 yards, you can have contact prior to the pass within 5 yards.That would be an illegal contact foul in the NFL but I believe in college you only get pass interference once the ball is in the air.
Plus I think there are relaxed rules once the QB scrambles out of the pocket which is probably why #43 goes and hits him once Martinez scrambles.
The receiver is also within 5 yards, you can have contact prior to the pass within 5 yards.
I was looking at when Martinez motions to move out of the pocket and when #43 started to break toward Ozigbo. It seems almost at the same time. #43 then hits Ozigbo while Martinez is still in the pocket (definitely still between the hashes) and motioning to throw to Spielman. I am surprised its not PI or some sort of illegal contact.That would be an illegal contact foul in the NFL but I believe in college you only get pass interference once the ball is in the air.
Plus I think there are relaxed rules once the QB scrambles out of the pocket which is probably why #43 goes and hits him once Martinez scrambles.
c. Defensive pass interference is contact beyond the neutral zone by a Team B player whose intent to impede an eligible opponent is obvious and could prevent the opponent the opportunity of receiving a catchable forward pass. When in question, a legal forward pass is catchable. Defensive pass interference occurs only after a legal forward pass is thrown
(A. R. 7-3-8-VII, VIII, XI and XII).
It is not defensive pass interference (A.R. 7-3-8-III and 7-3-9-III):
1. When, after the snap, opposing players immediately charge and establish contact with opponents at a point that is within one yard beyond the neutral zone.
2. When two or more eligible players are making a simultaneous and bona fide attempt to reach, catch or bat the pass. Eligible players of either team have equal rights to the ball (A.R. 7-3-8-IX).
3. When a Team B player legally contacts an opponent before the pass is thrown (A.R. 7-3-8-III and X).