I think it's going to be incredibly difficult to justify retaining Miles:
- he finished 12th or worse in five of his seven seasons at Nebraska
- his record is .500 in those seven seasons
- in a clear 'make or break it' year, with essentially his most talented roster at Nebraska, they fell apart
The performance evidence is largely against him. If people didn't like Miles as a person, would they be OK with these results? And the upcoming NIT is a very small portion of the overall body of work. Does any result there significantly alter perception?
There's really no excuse for a program with Nebraska's resources and capabilities to have never won a tournament game, and to not make the tournament on a somewhat consistent basis. Is Miles the guy to make that happen? The evidence suggests no.
- he finished 12th or worse in five of his seven seasons at Nebraska
- his record is .500 in those seven seasons
- in a clear 'make or break it' year, with essentially his most talented roster at Nebraska, they fell apart
The performance evidence is largely against him. If people didn't like Miles as a person, would they be OK with these results? And the upcoming NIT is a very small portion of the overall body of work. Does any result there significantly alter perception?
There's really no excuse for a program with Nebraska's resources and capabilities to have never won a tournament game, and to not make the tournament on a somewhat consistent basis. Is Miles the guy to make that happen? The evidence suggests no.
Last edited by a moderator: