Perimeter blocking will spring more long runs than a pulling guard. That's because most big run plays get bounced to the outside. If you can neutralize a defensive back who's out on an island with a receiver, the opportunity to go the distance grows dramatically. That's why the move of tight end Mike McNeill to wide receiver this spring, might not just be about the passing game.
Flash back to 1996. Nebraska was dominating the Big 12 North and NU churned out over 3,500 rushing yards, 45 rushing touchdowns, and 43 points per game. And one piece of that puzzle was wide receiver Jon Vedral (nicknamed "the Ved"). So respected and feared was he by opposing coaches and players as an outside blocker, that he was named honorable mention all-conference despite some very meager receiving totals. His film became "how-to" for future generations of perimeter blockers at Nebraska.
Now consider what happens when you put a 230 lbs. tight end, that's been practicing blocking extensively for years (under the same coach as the Ved) and think about what he could do to a defensive back. McNeill might produce more pancakes than Denny's. Do opposing teams want to counter with a linebacker? If so, are they ready to accept that matchup on pass plays? You can see the problem it creates for the opposition.
Sure, Nebraska would love to line up the next Andre Johnson at wideout. But when you're returning to a physical style that features the option, putting a tight end out wide doesn't sound half bad. Will defensive backs be ready for the return of the Ved? Not likely.
LINK
Last edited by a moderator: