NUance
Assistant Coach
Nearly polar opposite results for the first two seasons:
2015: 6-7
Brigham Young L 28-33
South Alabama W 48- 9
Miami (Fla.) L 33-36 (OT)
Southern Miss W 36-28
Illinois L 13-14
Wisconsin L 21-23
Minnesota W 48-25
Northwestern L 28-30
Purdue L 45-55
Michigan State W 39-38
Rutgers W 31-14
Iowa L 20-28
UCLA W 37-29
========================================================
2016: 9-4
Fresno State W 43-10
Wyoming W 52-17
Oregon W 35-32
Northwestern W 24-13
Illinois W 31-16
Indiana W 27-22
Purdue W 27-14
Wisconsin L 17-23 OT
Ohio State L 3-62
Minnesota W 24-17
Maryland W 28- 7
Iowa L 10-40 17
Tennessee L 24-38
========================================================
Okay, we have two full seasons under our belt for the Riley era. And almost polar opposite results for each season.
2015. We were snake bit in the early games. Couldn't win a close game to save our hide. We lost six heartbreakers that we should have won. But then we came alive at the end of the season and finished strong. We upset #6 Michigan State, took care of business against Rutgers, and might've beat #3 Iowa if the refs hadn't kicked Gerry out of the game on a sketchy targeting call. Then we ended strong with a bowl win over UCLA.
2016. We had a quality win over #22 Oregon, and beat all the lessor teams on our schedule to start 7-0. Then we got tagged in Madison for an OT loss to #11 Wisconsin, and got crushed by #6 tOSU in Columbus. Had a couple wins over happless Minny and Mary, and then ended the regular season with a disastrous to (ugh) Iowa. Missing several of our best players for the bowl, we capped a disappointing season end by losing to Tennessee on their home turf. Sure we won nine games, but I don't think 2016 was appreciably better than 2015 given the blowout losses and lack of marquee wins.
========================================================
The thing is, each of the two seasons had good spots and bad spots. 2015: Started weak and finished strong. We lost games we shouldn't have, but also won a couple we shouldn't have. 2016: Started strong and finished weak. We pretty much matched the expected W-L outcome for each game. We played Wiscy closer than anyone thought we would, but got blown out in an unexpected manner by tOSU and Iowa. Seems like the team lost focus the last couple of games. I still wonder about why some of our best senior players missed out on the last couple of games of their Husker careers. It almost adds a question mark to the leadership abilities of one or two of them.
I guess the point is that we've played some good football during the first two years. But also had some disappointing games. With nearly any coaching change resulting from the HC getting fired there's gonna be couple years of transition that will include disappointment. (Just look at Dabo Swinny's first three years!) I think we've mostly worked through that. Starting this fall Langsdorf and Banker will have the majority of their own players on the field rather than guys recruiting by Pelini. Maybe that'll make a difference. Maybe not. But we'll almost certainly be better at O-line this season. And probably D-line too. I think things will trend up this year. Or maybe it's just the off-season Kool-Aid talking. GBR!
(Yeah, I know. tldnr)
2015: 6-7
Brigham Young L 28-33
South Alabama W 48- 9
Miami (Fla.) L 33-36 (OT)
Southern Miss W 36-28
Illinois L 13-14
Wisconsin L 21-23
Minnesota W 48-25
Northwestern L 28-30
Purdue L 45-55
Michigan State W 39-38
Rutgers W 31-14
Iowa L 20-28
UCLA W 37-29
========================================================
2016: 9-4
Fresno State W 43-10
Wyoming W 52-17
Oregon W 35-32
Northwestern W 24-13
Illinois W 31-16
Indiana W 27-22
Purdue W 27-14
Wisconsin L 17-23 OT
Ohio State L 3-62
Minnesota W 24-17
Maryland W 28- 7
Iowa L 10-40 17
Tennessee L 24-38
========================================================
Okay, we have two full seasons under our belt for the Riley era. And almost polar opposite results for each season.
2015. We were snake bit in the early games. Couldn't win a close game to save our hide. We lost six heartbreakers that we should have won. But then we came alive at the end of the season and finished strong. We upset #6 Michigan State, took care of business against Rutgers, and might've beat #3 Iowa if the refs hadn't kicked Gerry out of the game on a sketchy targeting call. Then we ended strong with a bowl win over UCLA.
2016. We had a quality win over #22 Oregon, and beat all the lessor teams on our schedule to start 7-0. Then we got tagged in Madison for an OT loss to #11 Wisconsin, and got crushed by #6 tOSU in Columbus. Had a couple wins over happless Minny and Mary, and then ended the regular season with a disastrous to (ugh) Iowa. Missing several of our best players for the bowl, we capped a disappointing season end by losing to Tennessee on their home turf. Sure we won nine games, but I don't think 2016 was appreciably better than 2015 given the blowout losses and lack of marquee wins.
========================================================
The thing is, each of the two seasons had good spots and bad spots. 2015: Started weak and finished strong. We lost games we shouldn't have, but also won a couple we shouldn't have. 2016: Started strong and finished weak. We pretty much matched the expected W-L outcome for each game. We played Wiscy closer than anyone thought we would, but got blown out in an unexpected manner by tOSU and Iowa. Seems like the team lost focus the last couple of games. I still wonder about why some of our best senior players missed out on the last couple of games of their Husker careers. It almost adds a question mark to the leadership abilities of one or two of them.
I guess the point is that we've played some good football during the first two years. But also had some disappointing games. With nearly any coaching change resulting from the HC getting fired there's gonna be couple years of transition that will include disappointment. (Just look at Dabo Swinny's first three years!) I think we've mostly worked through that. Starting this fall Langsdorf and Banker will have the majority of their own players on the field rather than guys recruiting by Pelini. Maybe that'll make a difference. Maybe not. But we'll almost certainly be better at O-line this season. And probably D-line too. I think things will trend up this year. Or maybe it's just the off-season Kool-Aid talking. GBR!

(Yeah, I know. tldnr)
Last edited by a moderator: