Cdog923
New member
Ha, well played.
As in...it will free up your SaturdayIt won't be miserable for me. It will be quite liberating.
At this point...if Riley stays...next year will be miserable at a level that most of us can't even comprehend.
AgreedKansas had zero points last week and still spent a decent chunk of time having more points than yards.
I didn't want Riley here from the start, and I don't want him here now, but I can comprehend a lot worse.
If you are an adult that buys and wears one of these things you are a giant boob. IMO
These are like those foolish "Got Frank" shirt dingles were wearing in 2004.
We get it. You don't like giant boobs.If you are an adult that buys and wears one of these things you are a giant boob. IMO
These are like those foolish "Got Frank" shirt dingles were wearing in 2004.
I couldn't agree more. It's starting to become creepy now. Or it's just all in fun. I'm not quite sure at this point, lines are being blurred.Those shirts just reek of desperation.
What if you're a former player who buys a shirt like that and posts a picture on Twitter while wearing it?
In Part 1, we nibbled around the corners of the Scott Frost offense. Now it’s time to take a deep dive into it, examining not only the Oregon parts that will always be present, but also the additional wrinkles he’s thrown in since leaving Eugene. This is a lot of film, and I can’t embed it all into one post without locking up your mobile devices.
Accordingly, I’ve linked a lot of what I’m going to discuss, so when you see a hyperlink, it’ll open up a new tab showing you the concept I’m discussing. In other words, this is probably a post you want to view on a computer rather than a mobile device. If not, it’s going to take a while to load and you’re forever going to be opening and closing new tabs. You’ve be warned, so let’s get to it.
https://huskerchalktalk.com/2017/10/24/talking-scott-frost-part-ii/