Its time to put a stake through the Bolievers!
Qb play is much improved
Tackling is much improved
Receiving is much improved
O-line play is much improved
Linebacker play is much improved
Playcalling is much improved
Run defense is much improved
Half time adjustments, ah yes, half time adjustments again!
Team moral and chemistry is much improved
We have professionals that are teachers and not just yellers.
All this and we have yet to field a team at full strength.
If Riley could win a Conference Championship in his first year, hell any year, that would throw the final shovel of dirt on them.
They should build a statue of Eichorst for fixing one of Tom's biggest mistakes.
Thank you Shawn Eichorst, for making decisions to help make Husker football GREAT again.
Simmer down, now.
Even with McNeese State, some of us optimists saw all of the above last season, leading up to Michigan State in Game 6.
I'm high on Mike Riley, but in fairness to the advice I've given his critics, maybe we should all wait a season or three before declaring anything with bold assurance.
I am ok with waiting, but when there is stark evidence it is hard to ignore. In fairness, the optimists ignored 6 years of evidence that it was not going to get better under 408, some still don't see it after an NCAA record of 408 yards was set against NEBRASKA, not Southern Alabama or FAU or any other school that has fielded a pathetic football team in the last 130 years.
I think your bias is so strong against anything Bo Pelini, that you assume
anything different is better.
We were favored in game 1, and by a combination of execution and coaching, we lost the game.
In game 2, we played a much weaker opponent, and won handily.
There were things in each game we did well, and some we struggled with. Some of your points may be true, some may not, and some can not in any way be objectively measured at this point in time. I suggest a wait and see approach before crowning anyone.