My argument is simply that if you look at results on the field -- not guesswork from writers, network suits, and BCS computers -- teams from the major conferences, and some schools from smaller conferences, are actually a lot more evenly matched than most fans believe.
Despite being approximately equal to other conferences in most quantifiable categories, the SEC and other southern schools are unfairly presented with championship opportunities and favors on what is far from a level playing field.
QFT
How is that trolling? Louisville had a resume that is arguably the same as the four teams in the SEC who lost 2 games. Louisville placed 21st in the final BCS standings, and the 4 SEC teams were granted spots 7, 8, 9, and 10. Why? Aside from South Carolina's win over Clemson, Louisville had a better win than any of them. Anyone catch the Sugar Bowl? Louisville absolutely manhandled #3 Florida, if you missed it.
Also, to show how broken this whole process is; a horrible Tennessee team was ranked early this year, and a very mediocre Mississippi State team, who got blown out by every decent team they faced this year and finished 4-4 in conference play (the 4 teams they beat combined for 3 wins in conference play) was ranked as high as 13 deep into this year. Something is very wrong here.
