True2tRA said:
http://247sports.com/Bolt/Cavanaugh-Theres-a-gap-40616554
I know thats like the topic around here but to me the guys that are in there are our best players, Cavanaugh said. Theres a gap. How many NFL games do guys watch where they rotate guys just to rotate. Ive never done that. Like it or not its something we havent done or I havent done that. I think those top guys are who should be playing and are playing.
To me I have a hard time if theres separation between players, whether it is physically or mentally, I wouldnt rotate them in.
Other guys are going to grow, he said. "There are some guys that I like. Im not going to name names, but if they were ready, trust me theyd be playing, you know what I mean?"
Get him cm husker! This focker Cavanaugh thinks he know more about coaching the offensive line than you do! That derty sumbeach!
Huh? Not sure why you threw this in this thread or called me out about substitutions. I've not said much, if anything, on the topic.
But because you raised it, Cavanaugh is extremely misguided if he thinks these kids are going to "get ready" while never touching the field. Practice is great, but it can't simulate game situations. I don't care what the NFL does; guys rotate and need to rotate in college because that's how you gain experience and prepare for when the class turnsover.
This is discussions is really related to another significant concern I have about this offense and the philosophy being instilled now: if you can't pass block, you can't play.
That's why we have guys like Wilbon, who has showed flashes of real ability as a dynamic running back, riding the pine. Because the premium put on "pass pro" keeps guys on the bench. As I've said, Ameer would have struggled to see the field in this offense.
And the same is true of certain OL men. Pass blocking is one of the most difficult tasks, mentally and physically, that you can put on an OL. It takes a ton of time in practice to work the various looks an OL may face in a given game and understand exactly how it fits together.
Run blocking on the contrary, though it can be more complicated, is less reaction based and more aggressive. A guy has to learn his assignment and go execute, not learn his assignment based on a variety of situations, read the correct situation at game speed and then execute.
I have a simple philosophy when it comes to college offense: reduce the number of "choices" or reads for a players by putting D's in a position where they have to commit to one look or another. This is true of the passing game, which is why I like option employed, as it simplifies defensive coverages usually. It's why I like run based offenses, because it makes it "easier" on the OL to know what he's doing and go out and exert his will on the opponent.
No one can tell me that guys like Tanner Farmer, with his physical ability alone, doesn't deserve a look at game speed. We need to run an offense that gives our playmakers a chance.