and Bo can rack up as many of these games in 2 seasons as Bob has in 10. 1 every other year isn't as concerning as 3 per.First of all, if Wisky had wanted to win by 70, they very easily could have. No question about it.We were not throttle by 70 points. It was 40. And yes, Stoops has had some embarrassing losses too. Bo Pelini and Nebraska are not the only coach/program that has really bad days at the office.Lol exactly! The point is that he went on to win a national championship as a head coach (year 2 nonetheless)... regardless of what would happen after. I can't remember ou ever being throttled by the tune of around 70 points under Bob.You know another parallel that's interesting is big brother stoops. He was brought in by spurrier to fix the D. He did. He went on to OU and in 2000 their D absolutly shut down Florida State in the title game. Now when you look at bob stoops teams they are offensive powerhouses with less defense lately. So I guess every coach has up and down years in their "specialty."
2003 Big 12 championship game Kansas St lost 31-7
2004 USC lost 55-14
2007 West Virginia lost 48-28
2009 Texas Tech lost 41-13
2011 Okla St. lost 44-10
No, Stoops has never had one of them days. He's so perfect in every way.
What gets me is when our team does play really well and gets a win, it's because the other team sucks. The double standard here would make folks in D.C. rub their head.
Second, look at those teams you name and think about the offenses they had in the repsective years that you name. Save for that KSU offense, (which, as we all remember, manhandled the Pelini-led defense badly enough that the ever-classy, then 35 year-old coach had to berate a 60+ year-old man post-game) those were all very legit offenseive teams. UCLA has what, the 30th best scoring offense (on PAC-10+2 defenses, mind you); Wisky was somewhere in the 80s before we so graciously helped them pad their total. Even OSU barely cracks the Top-20.
I'm by no means saying that "Big Game Bob" is perfect, but try comparing apples to apples.
When you saidyou know exactly what i meant sir. we got 70 points put on us... bobby doesn't know what that's like.We were not throttle by 70 points. It was 40. And yes, Stoops has had some embarrassing losses too. Bo Pelini and Nebraska are not the only coach/program that has really bad days at the office.Lol exactly! The point is that he went on to win a national championship as a head coach (year 2 nonetheless)... regardless of what would happen after. I can't remember ou ever being throttled by the tune of around 70 points under Bob.You know another parallel that's interesting is big brother stoops. He was brought in by spurrier to fix the D. He did. He went on to OU and in 2000 their D absolutly shut down Florida State in the title game. Now when you look at bob stoops teams they are offensive powerhouses with less defense lately. So I guess every coach has up and down years in their "specialty."
2003 Big 12 championship game Kansas St lost 31-7
2004 USC lost 55-14
2007 West Virginia lost 48-28
2009 Texas Tech lost 41-13
2011 Okla St. lost 44-10
No, Stoops has never had one of them days. He's so perfect in every way.
What gets me is when our team does play really well and gets a win, it's because the other team sucks. The double standard here would make folks in D.C. rub their head.
He's so perfect in every way? Lets not get emotional... I never hinted at anything of the sort.
it sure sounded like you were talking margin of victory, not points given up.this years loss in the CCG would be comparable to Spurriers loss in the 96 fiesta bowl if Florida scored zero points.
I figured that's what you meant. Not trying to starte heated argument. But just in case I wanted to point out that we did lose by 40, not 70, and that Stoops has lost by similar margins on just more than one "fluke" case, as a way to show that everyone has their bad days. Alabama lost to Texas A&M and could stop the Aggies to save their a$$.you know exactly what i meant sir. we got 70 points put on us... bobby doesn't know what that's like.We were not throttle by 70 points. It was 40. And yes, Stoops has had some embarrassing losses too. Bo Pelini and Nebraska are not the only coach/program that has really bad days at the office.Lol exactly! The point is that he went on to win a national championship as a head coach (year 2 nonetheless)... regardless of what would happen after. I can't remember ou ever being throttled by the tune of around 70 points under Bob.You know another parallel that's interesting is big brother stoops. He was brought in by spurrier to fix the D. He did. He went on to OU and in 2000 their D absolutly shut down Florida State in the title game. Now when you look at bob stoops teams they are offensive powerhouses with less defense lately. So I guess every coach has up and down years in their "specialty."
2003 Big 12 championship game Kansas St lost 31-7
2004 USC lost 55-14
2007 West Virginia lost 48-28
2009 Texas Tech lost 41-13
2011 Okla St. lost 44-10
No, Stoops has never had one of them days. He's so perfect in every way.
What gets me is when our team does play really well and gets a win, it's because the other team sucks. The double standard here would make folks in D.C. rub their head.
He's so perfect in every way? Lets not get emotional... I never hinted at anything of the sort.
And yet he still got thrashed. It happens to the best.Bob Stoops has won a national championship and 7 conference championships. There is no comparison between him and Pelini at this point in time.
I can find no fault in this. You are what make the internet worthwhile, Sir.Oh, but he's just looking at the bright side of life. And the alternative. :dunnoWell, the first part of the song works, anyway...Not so sure the second part is a pick me up...
/ actually I was just looking for an excuse to post something Monty Python. lol
none of hose teams were 7-5 they were all top 10 teams big differenceWe were not throttle by 70 points. It was 40. And yes, Stoops has had some embarrassing losses too. Bo Pelini and Nebraska are not the only coach/program that has really bad days at the office.Lol exactly! The point is that he went on to win a national championship as a head coach (year 2 nonetheless)... regardless of what would happen after. I can't remember ou ever being throttled by the tune of around 70 points under Bob.You know another parallel that's interesting is big brother stoops. He was brought in by spurrier to fix the D. He did. He went on to OU and in 2000 their D absolutly shut down Florida State in the title game. Now when you look at bob stoops teams they are offensive powerhouses with less defense lately. So I guess every coach has up and down years in their "specialty."
2003 Big 12 championship game Kansas St lost 31-7
2004 USC lost 55-14
2007 West Virginia lost 48-28
2009 Texas Tech lost 41-13
2011 Okla St. lost 44-10
No, Stoops has never had one of them days. He's so perfect in every way.
What gets me is when our team does play really well and gets a win, it's because the other team sucks. The double standard here would make folks in D.C. rub their head.
I think you are correct about this. When a team continues to run the same plays with great success and we can't make adjustments to stop it, the team has some serious problems. If coaching is the problem, we'll see similar things in the next couple of years. If the problem is players, it could get fixed by next year. If the problem is a combination of coaching and players, things may get much worse. I hope I'm wrong but I can see this game kicking off the same sequence of events that occured in the years after the '01 CU game.People can compare this to the Fiesta if they like, but I don't see it. The most comparable game I can think of is the 01' stomping we took at the hands of CU. These two games are very comparable. Wisconsin really didn't do anything too special than just simply hit us in the mouth time and time again which is the same thing CU did back in 01'.
Under Osborne, I would definitely see this game being instructional.I agree with TO that this kind of game can be instructional. But we've seen about 5 of these meltdowns in the last 2 years. How do we know this is going to be the one that's instructional? We obviously didn't learn much the last 4 times around.