Shatel's Article

I think that Bo has "developed" a pretty good staff. I believe the staff as a whole has become better recruiters, in turn lesser of a need to develop 2 stars into first rounders. I believe the staff is better at finding under the radar talent than most in the country. We may not always land these kids but the staff sure has the whole evaluation thing down.

 
Saying that success unequivocally comes down to the head coach, much like saying that success unequivocally comes down to the players, is an incredibly flawed statement.

 
The coaches are 100% to blame when things fail.

Except for the other 100% of the time when it's the players fault.

What was this thread about again?

 
I blame Landlord for the pony posse failing.

I credit me for it succeeding so

Eliza-Dushku-Tongue-Gif-01.gif


 
We didn't need the Internet in the 1970s. Tom Osborne was on the hot seat from nearly the beginning. Back when people just grumbled loudly in analog real-life situations, Osborne was so aware of fan disatisfaction that he interviewed for the head coaching job in Boulder, in 1978 iirc. The scoring explosion teams of the early '80s bought him another 10 years. But again, no Internet was required. Osborne was keenly aware of his reputation for not winning the big game, and sometimes losing embarrassingly to teams perceived as more elite than Nebraska.

And you know what? He learned from that. The Huskers had been built for strength in Boyd Eppley's weight room, and looking at the elite teams beating the Huskers Osborne realized he had to recruit for defensive speed.

Absolutely a team and coach need to earn the fans' trust. They need to earn the fans' everything. College football is an entertainment product, and those fan dollars and TV contracts pay for the inflated coaching salaries. A coach doesn't need to answer to every yahoo's complaint or suggestion, but he damn well better be putting an entertaining product on the field. If Husker fans are spoiled, it's because a lot of effort went into making us the pride of college football. I think most of us are reasonable in the way we've reduced expecations, but it's hardly chippy to want to do better than a 4 loss season and at least one televised humiliation.

I mean, after awhile you learn to avoid M. Night Shamalayan movies, right?
I remember thinking that people were over-reacting because Bob D. was so good. I figured NU would never be that good again, and we should just be happy to have TO, because NU was always in the top 20, sometimes in the top 10, and almost never got blown out by any team not named Oklahoma. Then Washington blew out NU 2 years in a row and i wanted TO fired. I looked up blowout losses for TO just to remind myself. I used a point differential greater than 14 to define a blow out. It looks like Bo has suffered many more embarrassing losses than TO.

Year Score Opponent

1973 27-0 Oklahoma

1975 35-10 Oklahoma

1977 38-7 Oklahoma

1978 20-3 Alabama

1985 27-7 Oklahoma

1988 23-3 Miami

1989 41-17 Florida St.

1990 45-10 Oklahoma

1991 36-21 Washington

1991 22-0 Miami

1992 29-14 Washington

1996 19-0 Arizona St.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
We didn't need the Internet in the 1970s. Tom Osborne was on the hot seat from nearly the beginning. Back when people just grumbled loudly in analog real-life situations, Osborne was so aware of fan disatisfaction that he interviewed for the head coaching job in Boulder, in 1978 iirc. The scoring explosion teams of the early '80s bought him another 10 years. But again, no Internet was required. Osborne was keenly aware of his reputation for not winning the big game, and sometimes losing embarrassingly to teams perceived as more elite than Nebraska.

And you know what? He learned from that. The Huskers had been built for strength in Boyd Eppley's weight room, and looking at the elite teams beating the Huskers Osborne realized he had to recruit for defensive speed.

Absolutely a team and coach need to earn the fans' trust. They need to earn the fans' everything. College football is an entertainment product, and those fan dollars and TV contracts pay for the inflated coaching salaries. A coach doesn't need to answer to every yahoo's complaint or suggestion, but he damn well better be putting an entertaining product on the field. If Husker fans are spoiled, it's because a lot of effort went into making us the pride of college football. I think most of us are reasonable in the way we've reduced expecations, but it's hardly chippy to want to do better than a 4 loss season and at least one televised humiliation.

I mean, after awhile you learn to avoid M. Night Shamalayan movies, right?
I remember thinking that people were over-reacting because Bob D. was so good. I figured NU would never be that good again, and we should just be happy to have TO, because NU was always in the top 20, sometimes in the top 10, and almost never got blown out by any team not named Oklahoma. Then Washington blew out NU 2 years in a row and i wanted TO fired. I looked up blowout losses for TO just to remind myself. I used a point differential greater than 14 to define a blow out. It looks like Bo has suffered many more embarrassing losses than TO.

Year Score Opponent

1973 27-0 Oklahoma

1975 35-10 Oklahoma

1977 38-7 Oklahoma

1978 30-3 Oklahoma

1985 27-7 Oklahoma

1988 23-3 Miami

1989 41-17 Florida St.

1990 45-10 Oklahoma

1991 36-21 Washington

1991 22-0 Miami

1992 29-14 Washington

1996 19-0 Arizona St.
Can not compare, as TO took over for Bob D. and Bo had to rebuild what Frankie & Calihan tore down! It is easy to recruit when you are the team. These kids were not even thinking of football when we were good. They got to watch the Huskers under 2 bad coaches.

 
We didn't need the Internet in the 1970s. Tom Osborne was on the hot seat from nearly the beginning. Back when people just grumbled loudly in analog real-life situations, Osborne was so aware of fan disatisfaction that he interviewed for the head coaching job in Boulder, in 1978 iirc. The scoring explosion teams of the early '80s bought him another 10 years. But again, no Internet was required. Osborne was keenly aware of his reputation for not winning the big game, and sometimes losing embarrassingly to teams perceived as more elite than Nebraska.

And you know what? He learned from that. The Huskers had been built for strength in Boyd Eppley's weight room, and looking at the elite teams beating the Huskers Osborne realized he had to recruit for defensive speed.

Absolutely a team and coach need to earn the fans' trust. They need to earn the fans' everything. College football is an entertainment product, and those fan dollars and TV contracts pay for the inflated coaching salaries. A coach doesn't need to answer to every yahoo's complaint or suggestion, but he damn well better be putting an entertaining product on the field. If Husker fans are spoiled, it's because a lot of effort went into making us the pride of college football. I think most of us are reasonable in the way we've reduced expecations, but it's hardly chippy to want to do better than a 4 loss season and at least one televised humiliation.

I mean, after awhile you learn to avoid M. Night Shamalayan movies, right?
I remember thinking that people were over-reacting because Bob D. was so good. I figured NU would never be that good again, and we should just be happy to have TO, because NU was always in the top 20, sometimes in the top 10, and almost never got blown out by any team not named Oklahoma. Then Washington blew out NU 2 years in a row and i wanted TO fired. I looked up blowout losses for TO just to remind myself. I used a point differential greater than 14 to define a blow out. It looks like Bo has suffered many more embarrassing losses than TO.

Year Score Opponent

1973 27-0 Oklahoma

1975 35-10 Oklahoma

1977 38-7 Oklahoma

1978 30-3 Oklahoma

1985 27-7 Oklahoma

1988 23-3 Miami

1989 41-17 Florida St.

1990 45-10 Oklahoma

1991 36-21 Washington

1991 22-0 Miami

1992 29-14 Washington

1996 19-0 Arizona St.
In 1978 NU beat OU in Lincoln- I was there, the Billy Sims fumble inside the 10 sealed it

NU lost to OU by 7 in the bowl game- after losing to Missouri the week after the win over OU

 
We didn't need the Internet in the 1970s. Tom Osborne was on the hot seat from nearly the beginning. Back when people just grumbled loudly in analog real-life situations, Osborne was so aware of fan disatisfaction that he interviewed for the head coaching job in Boulder, in 1978 iirc. The scoring explosion teams of the early '80s bought him another 10 years. But again, no Internet was required. Osborne was keenly aware of his reputation for not winning the big game, and sometimes losing embarrassingly to teams perceived as more elite than Nebraska.

And you know what? He learned from that. The Huskers had been built for strength in Boyd Eppley's weight room, and looking at the elite teams beating the Huskers Osborne realized he had to recruit for defensive speed.

Absolutely a team and coach need to earn the fans' trust. They need to earn the fans' everything. College football is an entertainment product, and those fan dollars and TV contracts pay for the inflated coaching salaries. A coach doesn't need to answer to every yahoo's complaint or suggestion, but he damn well better be putting an entertaining product on the field. If Husker fans are spoiled, it's because a lot of effort went into making us the pride of college football. I think most of us are reasonable in the way we've reduced expecations, but it's hardly chippy to want to do better than a 4 loss season and at least one televised humiliation.

I mean, after awhile you learn to avoid M. Night Shamalayan movies, right?
I remember thinking that people were over-reacting because Bob D. was so good. I figured NU would never be that good again, and we should just be happy to have TO, because NU was always in the top 20, sometimes in the top 10, and almost never got blown out by any team not named Oklahoma. Then Washington blew out NU 2 years in a row and i wanted TO fired. I looked up blowout losses for TO just to remind myself. I used a point differential greater than 14 to define a blow out. It looks like Bo has suffered many more embarrassing losses than TO.

Year Score Opponent

1973 27-0 Oklahoma

1975 35-10 Oklahoma

1977 38-7 Oklahoma

1978 30-3 Oklahoma

1985 27-7 Oklahoma

1988 23-3 Miami

1989 41-17 Florida St.

1990 45-10 Oklahoma

1991 36-21 Washington

1991 22-0 Miami

1992 29-14 Washington

1996 19-0 Arizona St.
In 1978 NU beat OU in Lincoln- I was there, the Billy Sims fumble inside the 10 sealed it

NU lost to OU by 7 in the bowl game- after losing to Missouri the week after the win over OU
Fixed it, that was a 20-3 loss to Alabama in 1978.

 
Back
Top