Agreed! hopefully Watson is a better interviewee then a OCThis just made my day a little brighter.

Agreed! hopefully Watson is a better interviewee then a OCThis just made my day a little brighter.
Sanders was DB coach in 2003 when Bo was DC. Pretty sure Bo asked Sanders to come back to NU and work for him when he took over as HC.The more all of this plays out, the more I doubt Bo would promote from within. I'm not 100% sure that offensive staff (and some of the defensive staff) is entirely his to begin with. His connections to a number of those guys span a single season in which he was on the defensive side of the ball. Furthermore, a number of them have no connections to Watson either (which is why I kind of agree with Zoogies that Watson doesn't deserve all of the criticism he's receiving because this isn't entirely his doing). BUT, I do think he needs to go. Look at the coaches...
[don't see this as me bashing any coaches]
Watson: holdover - would this have been Bo's decision or Tom's?
Gilmore: ties to Watson - would this have been Bo's decision or Tom's?
Beck: ties to Bo
Carl P: obvious ties to Bo
Brown: ties to Tom (not to mention he was recruited back into coaching from the Fellowship of Christian Athletes - not exactly a breading ground for elite coaching)
Cotton: ties to Bo...maybe? After a single season? Not sure
JP: ties to Bo
Ekeler: ties to Bo
Sanders: ties to Tom
So, out of the 9 guys on the staff, Bo definately picked 4 (Ekeler, JP, Carl, Beck), Tom picked 2 (Brown, Sanders), and 3 (Watson, Gilmore, Cotton) are questionable how they ended up on the staff. Which 3 have a noose around their necks?
Possibly, but his ties are far more closely related to Tom than to Bo.Sanders was DB coach in 2003 when Bo was DC. Pretty sure Bo asked Sanders to come back to NU and work for him when he took over as HC.The more all of this plays out, the more I doubt Bo would promote from within. I'm not 100% sure that offensive staff (and some of the defensive staff) is entirely his to begin with. His connections to a number of those guys span a single season in which he was on the defensive side of the ball. Furthermore, a number of them have no connections to Watson either (which is why I kind of agree with Zoogies that Watson doesn't deserve all of the criticism he's receiving because this isn't entirely his doing). BUT, I do think he needs to go. Look at the coaches...
[don't see this as me bashing any coaches]
Watson: holdover - would this have been Bo's decision or Tom's?
Gilmore: ties to Watson - would this have been Bo's decision or Tom's?
Beck: ties to Bo
Carl P: obvious ties to Bo
Brown: ties to Tom (not to mention he was recruited back into coaching from the Fellowship of Christian Athletes - not exactly a breading ground for elite coaching)
Cotton: ties to Bo...maybe? After a single season? Not sure
JP: ties to Bo
Ekeler: ties to Bo
Sanders: ties to Tom
So, out of the 9 guys on the staff, Bo definately picked 4 (Ekeler, JP, Carl, Beck), Tom picked 2 (Brown, Sanders), and 3 (Watson, Gilmore, Cotton) are questionable how they ended up on the staff. Which 3 have a noose around their necks?
I agree, but shouldn't you also apply the same connection to Cotton as well? Why would Cotton be tied to Bo and not Osborne, while Sanders is tied to Osborne and not Bo? Both Cotton & Sanders were 1 year associates of Bo in 2003, yet are also former NU players under Osborne.Possibly, but his ties are far more closely related to Tom than to Bo.Sanders was DB coach in 2003 when Bo was DC. Pretty sure Bo asked Sanders to come back to NU and work for him when he took over as HC.The more all of this plays out, the more I doubt Bo would promote from within. I'm not 100% sure that offensive staff (and some of the defensive staff) is entirely his to begin with. His connections to a number of those guys span a single season in which he was on the defensive side of the ball. Furthermore, a number of them have no connections to Watson either (which is why I kind of agree with Zoogies that Watson doesn't deserve all of the criticism he's receiving because this isn't entirely his doing). BUT, I do think he needs to go. Look at the coaches...
[don't see this as me bashing any coaches]
Watson: holdover - would this have been Bo's decision or Tom's?
Gilmore: ties to Watson - would this have been Bo's decision or Tom's?
Beck: ties to Bo
Carl P: obvious ties to Bo
Brown: ties to Tom (not to mention he was recruited back into coaching from the Fellowship of Christian Athletes - not exactly a breading ground for elite coaching)
Cotton: ties to Bo...maybe? After a single season? Not sure
JP: ties to Bo
Ekeler: ties to Bo
Sanders: ties to Tom
So, out of the 9 guys on the staff, Bo definately picked 4 (Ekeler, JP, Carl, Beck), Tom picked 2 (Brown, Sanders), and 3 (Watson, Gilmore, Cotton) are questionable how they ended up on the staff. Which 3 have a noose around their necks?
That's why I questioned where Cotton came from. (i didn't know Cotton had played for NU) But, Sanders had 6 years of ties to this program before the 1 with Bo. 3 of them where with Tom. Do you not think Tom had a heavy hand in picking this staff? There too much Osborne influence in there not to think that Bo either wasn't capable, or able to assemble his own staff. If I had to pick from those 2 I'd go w/ "not able"I agree, but shouldn't you also apply the same connection to Cotton as well? Why would Cotton be tied to Bo and not Osborne, while Sanders is tied to Osborne and not Bo? Both Cotton & Sanders were 1 year associates of Bo in 2003, yet are also former NU players under Osborne.Possibly, but his ties are far more closely related to Tom than to Bo.Sanders was DB coach in 2003 when Bo was DC. Pretty sure Bo asked Sanders to come back to NU and work for him when he took over as HC.The more all of this plays out, the more I doubt Bo would promote from within. I'm not 100% sure that offensive staff (and some of the defensive staff) is entirely his to begin with. His connections to a number of those guys span a single season in which he was on the defensive side of the ball. Furthermore, a number of them have no connections to Watson either (which is why I kind of agree with Zoogies that Watson doesn't deserve all of the criticism he's receiving because this isn't entirely his doing). BUT, I do think he needs to go. Look at the coaches...
[don't see this as me bashing any coaches]
Watson: holdover - would this have been Bo's decision or Tom's?
Gilmore: ties to Watson - would this have been Bo's decision or Tom's?
Beck: ties to Bo
Carl P: obvious ties to Bo
Brown: ties to Tom (not to mention he was recruited back into coaching from the Fellowship of Christian Athletes - not exactly a breading ground for elite coaching)
Cotton: ties to Bo...maybe? After a single season? Not sure
JP: ties to Bo
Ekeler: ties to Bo
Sanders: ties to Tom
So, out of the 9 guys on the staff, Bo definately picked 4 (Ekeler, JP, Carl, Beck), Tom picked 2 (Brown, Sanders), and 3 (Watson, Gilmore, Cotton) are questionable how they ended up on the staff. Which 3 have a noose around their necks?
I'm not questioning how the staff was put together. I was questioning your assumption between the Cotton, Sanders to Bo, Osborne connection. Basically questioning your logic on the matter more than anything.That's why I questioned where Cotton came from. Sanders had 6 years of ties to this program before the 1 with Bo. 3 of them where with Tom. Do you not think Tom had a heavy hand in picking this staff? There too much Osborne influence in there not to think that Bo either wasn't capable, or able to assemble his own staff.I agree, but shouldn't you also apply the same connection to Cotton as well? Why would Cotton be tied to Bo and not Osborne, while Sanders is tied to Osborne and not Bo? Both Cotton & Sanders were 1 year associates of Bo in 2003, yet are also former NU players under Osborne.Possibly, but his ties are far more closely related to Tom than to Bo.Sanders was DB coach in 2003 when Bo was DC. Pretty sure Bo asked Sanders to come back to NU and work for him when he took over as HC.The more all of this plays out, the more I doubt Bo would promote from within. I'm not 100% sure that offensive staff (and some of the defensive staff) is entirely his to begin with. His connections to a number of those guys span a single season in which he was on the defensive side of the ball. Furthermore, a number of them have no connections to Watson either (which is why I kind of agree with Zoogies that Watson doesn't deserve all of the criticism he's receiving because this isn't entirely his doing). BUT, I do think he needs to go. Look at the coaches...
[don't see this as me bashing any coaches]
Watson: holdover - would this have been Bo's decision or Tom's?
Gilmore: ties to Watson - would this have been Bo's decision or Tom's?
Beck: ties to Bo
Carl P: obvious ties to Bo
Brown: ties to Tom (not to mention he was recruited back into coaching from the Fellowship of Christian Athletes - not exactly a breading ground for elite coaching)
Cotton: ties to Bo...maybe? After a single season? Not sure
JP: ties to Bo
Ekeler: ties to Bo
Sanders: ties to Tom
So, out of the 9 guys on the staff, Bo definately picked 4 (Ekeler, JP, Carl, Beck), Tom picked 2 (Brown, Sanders), and 3 (Watson, Gilmore, Cotton) are questionable how they ended up on the staff. Which 3 have a noose around their necks?
Ok, so Cotton is far more connected to Tom. Furthers my point. If Bo is going to impart his vision on this offense...it needs to be with his guys, not a patchwork staff put together from historical NU teams.I'm not questioning how the staff was put together. I was questioning your assumption between the Cotton, Sanders to Bo, Osborne connection. Basically questioning your logic on the matter more than anything.
If it happens, like you said it's because he didn't come her to be a RB coach forever. I think the decision would be more about keeping him, than about finding the best guy for this job. This offense is in serious need of new, young blood IMO. Beck might be able to do that. I wouldn't be entirely upset if they gave him a chance at it. But, if Watson goes, then Barney and Gilmore need to go as well, because getting rid of Watson, and not allowing the next OC to put together a staff isn't fair to the next guy. It will be the same ol' sh!t. It's not like Watson got a chance to build his own staff...but that ship has sailed. The next guy MUST have that opportunity.If anyone thinks Tim Beck came here to be an RB coach forever, lol.
I'd put odd at 90% Tim Beck being our OC if Watson leaves, 8% Barney and 2% somebody from the outside.
Who exactly would fire Cotton and Gilmore? Tim Beck who has coached with them for the last 3 years or Bo Pelini who is ultimately responsible for the defense, offense, and entire team? I agree that if Wats were to leave Tim Beck would become OC. I just dont see him becoming OC and then being allowed to fire anyone.If it happens, like you said it's because he didn't come her to be a RB coach forever. I think the decision would be more about keeping him, than about finding the best guy for this job. This offense is in serious need of new, young blood IMO. Beck might be able to do that. I wouldn't be entirely upset if they gave him a chance at it. But, if Watson goes, then Barney and Gilmore need to go as well, because getting rid of Watson, and not allowing the next OC to put together a staff isn't fair to the next guy. It will be the same ol' sh!t. It's not like Watson got a chance to build his own staff...but that ship has sailed. The next guy MUST have that opportunity.If anyone thinks Tim Beck came here to be an RB coach forever, lol.
I'd put odd at 90% Tim Beck being our OC if Watson leaves, 8% Barney and 2% somebody from the outside.
Hypothetically speaking, if Watson accepts a HC job elsewhere, I'd bet that Gilmore would follow him. They coached together at Colorado before coming to Nebraska.Who exactly would fire Cotton and Gilmore? Tim Beck who has coached with them for the last 3 years or Bo Pelini who is ultimately responsible for the defense, offense, and entire team? I agree that if Wats were to leave Tim Beck would become OC. I just dont see him becoming OC and then being allowed to fire anyone.If it happens, like you said it's because he didn't come her to be a RB coach forever. I think the decision would be more about keeping him, than about finding the best guy for this job. This offense is in serious need of new, young blood IMO. Beck might be able to do that. I wouldn't be entirely upset if they gave him a chance at it. But, if Watson goes, then Barney and Gilmore need to go as well, because getting rid of Watson, and not allowing the next OC to put together a staff isn't fair to the next guy. It will be the same ol' sh!t. It's not like Watson got a chance to build his own staff...but that ship has sailed. The next guy MUST have that opportunity.If anyone thinks Tim Beck came here to be an RB coach forever, lol.
I'd put odd at 90% Tim Beck being our OC if Watson leaves, 8% Barney and 2% somebody from the outside.
Watson: holdover - I think this is Tom's rec but I also think it's hard to go against that. Not just for continuity, Shawn can OC at a number of schools, such as Alabama, that wanted to lure him awayThe more all of this plays out, the more I doubt Bo would promote from within. I'm not 100% sure that offensive staff (and some of the defensive staff) is entirely his to begin with. His connections to a number of those guys span a single season in which he was on the defensive side of the ball. Furthermore, a number of them have no connections to Watson either (which is why I kind of agree with Zoogies that Watson doesn't deserve all of the criticism he's receiving because this isn't entirely his doing). BUT, I do think he needs to go. Look at the coaches...
[don't see this as me bashing any coaches]
Watson: holdover - would this have been Bo's decision or Tom's?
Gilmore: ties to Watson - would this have been Bo's decision or Tom's?
Beck: ties to Bo
Carl P: obvious ties to Bo
Brown: ties to Tom (not to mention he was recruited back into coaching from the Fellowship of Christian Athletes - not exactly a breading ground for elite coaching)
Cotton: ties to Bo...maybe? After a single season? Not sure
JP: ties to Bo
Ekeler: ties to Bo
Sanders: ties to Tom
So, out of the 9 guys on the staff, Bo definately picked 4 (Ekeler, JP, Carl, Beck), Tom picked 2 (Brown, Sanders), and 3 (Watson, Gilmore, Cotton) are questionable how they ended up on the staff. Which 3 have a noose around their necks?
That's why I see Bech as the ONLY possible option for coordinator if they promote, and I don't see that happening. I think Bo (if he makes a change) uses the chance to get his own staff in the fold. Or, as we are maybe seeing play out - Tom has said no changes and Bo said to hell w/ it, vivos los miami. But that can be debated in another thread.![]()