It was electronic timed at a SPARQ combine last summer. I suppose you flew down to Louisiana with your 40 electronic machine timer and recorded a different time? What did you clock him at?Tolbert doesn't run a 4.87 lmao.
Had over 1000 receiving yards this year against some pretty good competition.It was electronic timed at a SPARQ combine last summer. I suppose you flew down to Louisiana with your 40 electronic machine timer and recorded a different time? What did you clock him at?Tolbert doesn't run a 4.87 lmao.
We are not recruiting him for speed, he is going to be a possession type receiver. The 40 time at some combine is the most over-rated measurement imho. I will take his stats against Louisiana's type competition over some 40 time we ran back in the summer.
5 catches, 72 yards, 3 TD's vs. Belle Chasse
4 catches, 58 yards, 2 TD's vs John Curtis
3 catches, 82 yards, 1 TD vs Franklinton
You realize that kids just don't drop .4 seconds off their 40 just by getting 6 months older and doing a few squats in the weight room. Of course he can get faster, but it is quite marginal. A dramatic improvement would be -.1 or -.15 seconds. So let's say he worked his a$$ off, matured a little bit, that still puts him at the 4.77 range.It was electronic timed at a SPARQ combine last summer. I suppose you flew down to Louisiana with your 40 electronic machine timer and recorded a different time? What did you clock him at?Tolbert doesn't run a 4.87 lmao.
Since there is no way he increased his speed over the course of the year at all.
I clocked him at the same speed your brain apparently works: 0.
So is that closer to warp or light speed?It was electronic timed at a SPARQ combine last summer. I suppose you flew down to Louisiana with your 40 electronic machine timer and recorded a different time? What did you clock him at?Tolbert doesn't run a 4.87 lmao.
Since there is no way he increased his speed over the course of the year at all.
I clocked him at the same speed your brain apparently works: 0.
I didn't say he ran a 4.4 did I? I just said he doesn't run a 4.87.You realize that kids just don't drop .4 seconds off their 40 just by getting 6 months older and doing a few squats in the weight room. Of course he can get faster, but it is quite marginal. A dramatic improvement would be -.1 or -.15 seconds. So let's say he worked his a$$ off, matured a little bit, that still puts him at the 4.77 range.It was electronic timed at a SPARQ combine last summer. I suppose you flew down to Louisiana with your 40 electronic machine timer and recorded a different time? What did you clock him at?Tolbert doesn't run a 4.87 lmao.
Since there is no way he increased his speed over the course of the year at all.
I clocked him at the same speed your brain apparently works: 0.
Look, there are things to like about him. He uses his body well, which isn't always guaranteed for all big WR. He seems to have pretty good hands, but we don't know that for sure because WR isn't going to put drops on his highlight film. But no one can right minded put his speed or athleticism on the top of this kid's list.
Quincy also had an offer sheet comparable to Tolbert's. UCLA came in on signing day to try and sway Quincy. I'm going to trust these coaches when it comes to evaluating WR talent.FWIW, Quincy was 6'2" 195 and ran a 4.5-4.6 that I doubt was electronically timed.