SaturnDrew
Special Teams Player
I think we'll be very close in the coach's poll, but no chance in the AP after this week.
I can some what deal with the two Tech school losses, it's the ISU one that still completely kills me. :steam...and to think that half of his losses would be to Tech schools...... :bangExactly!!! Anyway, just to think that we could go 10-4 (if we win the next two games, loose to Texas and hopefully win our Bowl game) in Pelini's second year, went 9-4 his 1st. That is awesome, a lot of us hoped we would just have some kind of winning seasons period after the debacle that was 07. They keep doing what they are doing and the rankings will eventually come. Shoot, it is possible :koolaid2: that we could go 11-3 this year if we actually win out. Did I mention :koolaid2: .Pitt losing doesn't get us ranked, though.
Guys - we lost to Iowa State. We should not be concerned with being ranked.
Again i will say that being ranked is important. No one wants to go to a Lousiana-Lafayet, or a Bowling Green when they dont do much. They want to go to a USC, or a Flordia, Or a Oklahoma. Some team with a winning record and tradition. Alot of instate recruts want to go to instate schools. But someone who is good, really good wants to go to a high powered team. It helps to have a number around that team for most of the time. That number gives you national recognition. Im sorry but i think being ranked is a big thing for recruting. But thats just me.No the rankings dont matter. but here's my opinion. It's take a winout AND a win agains Texas to get back in. Theres just a perception against Nebraska right now in polling. We're just not "pretty" enough with not enough "PR" I'm callin it now. USC, after crapping their pants against Stanford, will still be in the top 15 because, well, it's USC and Pete Carroll and Kirk Herbstreit and Musberger just quiver to their knees when the hear or say that name.
I really don't agree with this. We would have been dropped from the rankings in years past after losing to Virginia Tech. We most certainly would have been dropped after losing again to Texas Tech. The fact that we clung on to the rankings after both of those losses tells me the perception of our team is changing.No the rankings dont matter. but here's my opinion. It's take a winout AND a win agains Texas to get back in. Theres just a perception against Nebraska right now in polling. We're just not "pretty" enough with not enough "PR" I'm callin it now. USC, after crapping their pants against Stanford, will still be in the top 15 because, well, it's USC and Pete Carroll and Kirk Herbstreit and Musberger just quiver to their knees when the hear or say that name.
you said large marge.I know but we didnt lose buy a large margPitt losing doesn't get us ranked, though.
Guys - we lost to Iowa State. We should not be concerned with being ranked.in. I would think they woudl take that into consideration. I would think they would be thinking more about the TT loss when we were at home and ranked 15th.
LOL i was wondering when someone would get that.you said large marge.I know but we didnt lose buy a large margPitt losing doesn't get us ranked, though.
Guys - we lost to Iowa State. We should not be concerned with being ranked.in. I would think they woudl take that into consideration. I would think they would be thinking more about the TT loss when we were at home and ranked 15th.
![]()
No fewer than +3 internets for calling up that image so quicklyyou said large marge.I know but we didnt lose buy a large margPitt losing doesn't get us ranked, though.
Guys - we lost to Iowa State. We should not be concerned with being ranked.in. I would think they woudl take that into consideration. I would think they would be thinking more about the TT loss when we were at home and ranked 15th.
![]()
Neb is better than teams already in the top 25 so why not.
Pitt losing doesn't get us ranked, though.
Guys - we lost to Iowa State. We should not be concerned with being ranked.