Seems like a conference realignment discussion not just a football discussion. Getting the Kansas basketball property would justify bringing a s#!tty football program into the mix.
A smarter fool is still a fool. B1G needs to make a move.
BTW Iowa State is an AAU School.
I didn’t say it was going to be ‘the big addition’. It would be a much better addition than what people think based solely on the basketball eyeballs and revenue it brings to the conference.Kansas can't be the big addition. Not when the SEC just added Texas and OU. If you're going to add Kansas, you better find a way to go get Notre Dame. The goal here absolutely HAS to be to keep up with the SEC. Specifically, on the football field.
I still wouldn't rule out the B1G making a run at the top Pac-12 schools.
I agree - Big 10 'underwhelmed' with the addition of Rutgers and Maryland. The only big impact school equal to the Tx and Ou move is ND. Yes, Kansas is great for basketball but its only imprint on football is opening up the KC market a bit more. But NU was pretty active there already. ND doesn't expand the Big 10 footprint but their reputation will enhance the appeal of the Big 10. Too much of the recruiting hotbeds are in SEC territory and wt Tex and Okla they have a stronger hold on both of those states. Oklahoma State could help us with exposure but Ok State isn't the right fit for the Big 10. If the Big 10 brass look down at NU, they would completely distain OK State. Again, if we can lure Sandford or some other California school that would help with recruitment.Kansas can't be the big addition. Not when the SEC just added Texas and OU. If you're going to add Kansas, you better find a way to go get Notre Dame. The goal here absolutely HAS to be to keep up with the SEC. Specifically, on the football field.
I still wouldn't rule out the B1G making a run at the top Pac-12 schools.
there is literally not another university big10 could add who is equal with Texas or Oklahoma. come on.And you consider adding Iowa St to be an equatable move, compared to what the SEC is doing?
Nope, but I saw Iowa State rumored somewhere.And you consider adding Iowa St to be an equatable move, compared to what the SEC is doing?
It's the reason that Miami, Florida State, or Clemson weren't added in the 2010 shuffle. The SEC defers to the school they already have in-state for approval.
The goal here absolutely HAS to be to keep up with the SEC. Specifically, on the football field.