Seriously? No, negatory. Missouri would not get creamed by a lot of SEC teams. In fact, no one in the SEC would cream Missouri... Or Texas.. Or Oklahoma.. Or Kansas.. Or Texas Tech..
Possible slight beat down on NU, OSU, and CU. But that's only on the road against the top 3 teams in the SEC. Against the rest of the league? No way Jose. Not in this lifetime.
For you my man, and all others that buy into the SEC as numero uno toughness conference (and by the way, there is only one numero uno and he is here Proudly on the board) here's a newsflash:
SEC does not mean LSU only. Which a majority of people think that's what SEC means.
SEC does not mean Florida & LSU. Or throw in Georgia (first time in a decade they've been ranked so high.. and based on preseason feel good predictions for heaven's sake)..
SEC means all 12 teams. And 7 out of the 12 are average teams at best. Mediocre. Non-top 25. Decent defense, no offense.
Maybe it's just me and a few others that actually watch the games and have a feel for what's happening on the field.
The "hands down, better athletes, overall speed" hogwash is just that. A bold statement of crapola. Without the "ola".
First, Florida would cream Texas, Kansas, or Texas Tech
Second, I haven't heard anyone suggest the SEC=LSU. Apparently, you think the SEC stinks after LSU and Florida (maybe Georgia). Sorry, but Auburn, Alabama, and South Carolina are better than mediocre. More to the point, the bottom of every conference is mediocre. Are the bottom seven teams of the Big 12 top 25? Of course not.
Third, how about offering an opinion based on evidence, instead of dismissing everyone who disagrees with you as not part of the selective few "that actually watch the games and have a feel for what's happening on the field."
