MichiganDad3
All-American
I remember the game clearly. I lived in Louisiana at the time, and was excited about Mickey Joseph, a small but fast Louisiana kid. In those days 2 or 3 games per year were on television in that part of the country, and that game was a real disappointment. It was then that I incorrectly concluded that TO would never be as good as Devaney.That was 45 back in the day when our defense was one of the best in the nation, and offenses were nowhere near as dynamic and explosive as they are now. Yes, 63 and 70 are friggin' terrible, but that article gives a LOT of perspective to the situation. That was arguably the best coach in college football history who got beat by 35 and had to explain it to the media. And if I remember right, he had a lot of success later on.Cue me then. 70 is much worse than 45, and to make it worse this team gave up over 60 twice. I can stomach 45 if it is a close game, but two epic beat downs surrendering over 60 points is unacceptable.Excellent find OP. Cue the "Nebraska doesnt get blown out-45 points is not 70" crowd.
What year is that from anyways? I'm not old enough to have experienced that.