And there is a woman who has never played football so she will be easily swayed.Another thing to take into consideration with this committee is that the President or Head of the Committee is the AD at Arkansas. The SEC already has a leg up just with that.
Not necessarily. That woman's IQ is probably equal to everyone else's combined.And there is a woman who has never played football so she will be easily swayed.Another thing to take into consideration with this committee is that the President or Head of the Committee is the AD at Arkansas. The SEC already has a leg up just with that.
If Ohio state beats Michigan State, then Ohio State is playing FSU in the National Championship. If you think that wouldn't have been the case, then I suggest you stop counting on ESPN to provide your logic.Im wrong? Ohio State was going to be kicked aside for a one loss Auburn. How am I wrong? espn spent a week straight justifying the jump before Ohio State did them a solid and lost to MSU.True2tRA said:There is 1 undefeated team in the BCS top 25 right now, that's number 1 FSU. The 5th ranked team has 2 losses. So please, explain to me how an undefeated Nebraska would not be in the top 4? Matter of fact, don't explain it, because I won't listen. You are wrong.1995 Redux said:Mark Richt will not be here anytime soon. Why leave a good situation in the SEC? Come to the Big Ten where going possibly undefeated could get you left out in the cold from a National Title.
And youre dreaming if you think the 4 team playoff is ging to solve the chaos.
This guy gets it. ^We can agree to disagree but I just don't see the BCS leaving am undefeated conference champion out of the title game in exchange for a 1 loss team that needed 2 last second miracles to only have 1 loss.I disagree. Wish and hope they would have. Think about it. Say the SEC and Big Ten title games go exactly the same way. Only this time Ohio State wins on a last second hail mary. ESPN would get right to work on Final. Auburn won handily against #4 Mizzou while tOSU struggled and won on a fluke play against #11 MSU. ESPN is not the end game judge when determining rankings. But they are a huge contributor.Yeah. Ohio State had their ticket punched to the National title Game if they beat Michigan State.
I think the selection committee would have chosen it the same way.
I know that we all think ESPN is corrupt but they don't have that much influence.
Richt has averaged just under 4 losses per year while at Georgia. Pelini is, as we know, right at 4.
What he has going for him is 2 SEC Championships. Pelini of course has 0 conference championships.
One could argue that he could recruit as well or better than Bo to Nebraska, but there are a lot of variables to make it definitive.
In my humble opinion, Bo is the B1G's Mark Richt. I just don't see any discernible difference between the two.
If you are under the assumption I blindly agree with ESPNs flawed logic and or wanted Auburn to leapfrog tOSU, you are mistaken. I wanted the SEC locked out of the title game. I wanted ESPN to mourn their absence and not be able to give the month long 8straight title build up. F that. But the Buckeyes lost and ruined that.If Ohio state beats Michigan State, then Ohio State is playing FSU in the National Championship. If you think that wouldn't have been the case, then I suggest you stop counting on ESPN to provide your logic.Im wrong? Ohio State was going to be kicked aside for a one loss Auburn. How am I wrong? espn spent a week straight justifying the jump before Ohio State did them a solid and lost to MSU.True2tRA said:There is 1 undefeated team in the BCS top 25 right now, that's number 1 FSU. The 5th ranked team has 2 losses. So please, explain to me how an undefeated Nebraska would not be in the top 4? Matter of fact, don't explain it, because I won't listen. You are wrong.1995 Redux said:Mark Richt will not be here anytime soon. Why leave a good situation in the SEC? Come to the Big Ten where going possibly undefeated could get you left out in the cold from a National Title.
And youre dreaming if you think the 4 team playoff is ging to solve the chaos.
I also never said the playoff would solve the chaos. So I'm sorry, I don't know how to even respond to the words you,put in my mouth there. I certainly think it will be better than the current system, but I believe it will eventually evolve to an 8 team playoff and that would suit me just fine.
I should have used the little sarcasm guy. I wrote what i wrote to show that Jeff Long will have no more influence over who gets in anymore than Rice being a woman that can't use logic to choose teams.Not necessarily. That woman's IQ is probably equal to everyone else's combined.And there is a woman who has never played football so she will be easily swayed.Another thing to take into consideration with this committee is that the President or Head of the Committee is the AD at Arkansas. The SEC already has a leg up just with that.
Now that you pointed that out it does sound funny.Richt has averaged just under 4 losses per year while at Georgia. Pelini is, as we know, right at 4.
What he has going for him is 2 SEC Championships. Pelini of course has 0 conference championships.
One could argue that he could recruit as well or better than Bo to Nebraska, but there are a lot of variables to make it definitive.
In my humble opinion, Bo is the B1G's Mark Richt. I just don't see any discernible difference between the two.![]()
Where did I say I expected the BCS to do the "right" thing? I don't like the BCS system and Ive already said a hundred f'ing times I'm looking forward to a 4 team/eventually 8 team playoff. Where the f#*k did I say I expected it to work out how the fans wanted it to either? Stop, just STOP putting f'ing words in my mouth. What an ignorant comment to say this must be my first year watching. If you're trying to f#*k with me, good for you, mission accomplished. You've literally not responded to a f'ing thing I've said in any reasonable manner.If you are under the assumption I blindly agree with ESPNs flawed logic and or wanted Auburn to leapfrog tOSU, you are mistaken. I wanted the SEC locked out of the title game. I wanted ESPN to mourn their absence and not be able to give the month long 8straight title build up. F that. But the Buckeyes lost and ruined that.If Ohio state beats Michigan State, then Ohio State is playing FSU in the National Championship. If you think that wouldn't have been the case, then I suggest you stop counting on ESPN to provide your logic.Im wrong? Ohio State was going to be kicked aside for a one loss Auburn. How am I wrong? espn spent a week straight justifying the jump before Ohio State did them a solid and lost to MSU.True2tRA said:There is 1 undefeated team in the BCS top 25 right now, that's number 1 FSU. The 5th ranked team has 2 losses. So please, explain to me how an undefeated Nebraska would not be in the top 4? Matter of fact, don't explain it, because I won't listen. You are wrong.1995 Redux said:Mark Richt will not be here anytime soon. Why leave a good situation in the SEC? Come to the Big Ten where going possibly undefeated could get you left out in the cold from a National Title.
And youre dreaming if you think the 4 team playoff is ging to solve the chaos.
I also never said the playoff would solve the chaos. So I'm sorry, I don't know how to even respond to the words you,put in my mouth there. I certainly think it will be better than the current system, but I believe it will eventually evolve to an 8 team playoff and that would suit me just fine.
My original point was why would Richt leave GA to come here, where we play in a league that has such a bad current reputation the media talks about bumpind one loss teams from another league ahead of our undefeated champion. A league Richt is currently in.
And Im honestly stunned at how much faith some people have in the BCS. You honestly expected it to just do the right thing because it should? Like I said before, it couldve put anybody in the #2 spot and we couldnt do a thing about it since this is its swan song. If you really just expected the BCS to work out how the fams wanted it to this mustve been your first year watching.
Me neither. It's over. We just disagree and it's a pretty basic disagreement. Let's not complicate it. I think they would have, you think they wouldn't have, case closed.The right thing Im referring to is putting tOSU in the title game had they gone undefeated. I dont feel the BCS was going to do that.
Not trying to start a war.