With the changing landscape of strength and conditioning, separating from the pack in strength alone will be impossible.
Similar concept...NU was running an offense no one else really did in the 90's - option football. Our problem was speed up until the 90's. When we recruited real athletes around the muscle, we were set apart.
Year-over-year top schools in the country:
Tier 1 - Bama and Clemson
Tier 2 - Georgia, Oklahoma, OSU
No Tier 1 and 2 team plays fast; they're mostly pro-style offenses. All have shown they can recruit stoutly near the lines except for OU's weaker defenses.
My point - NU would be a set-apart offensive style in this group, and if we can hold our own with the big boys at the line, the Oregon pace and athlete style would make us vastly different. If Oregon had parity at the lines against LSU and Auburn in recent past, I think they win at least one of those games and the OSU NC game is closer.
Watch Scott's pressers. Look at the offers. Big, long athletes everywhere. Get them with Duval to bulk. Throw in a couple waterbeds (Robinson <-> De'Anthony
Thomas), play at lightning pace...throw in our tradition and legacy to boot. Who else has all of this? It's Scott's angle to be different and get back to Tier 1.
The one place I'm not fully sold is the defensive priority for turnovers. I'd rather see stops. I don't want to sit through an interview at the end of a game and complain "we just couldn't get the ball back." We need stops. 3rd and 2...no gain (hell, we'd take 3rd and 12 stops at this point). Disciplined teams can keep the ball. I don't want to give up 495 yards and grab the ball three times to have to call it a defensive success.