Can't hurt, and it's an interesting read, so HERE IT IS.Do we need the skeleton thread ressurected where it says that the fastest 40 time ever scientifically measured was by an OLYIMPIC sprinter at 4.38 seconds.
***SNIP***
no mention in the post that it was borrowed mostly from the San Diego Union-Tribune. linkCan't hurt, and it's an interesting read, so HERE IT IS.Do we need the skeleton thread ressurected where it says that the fastest 40 time ever scientifically measured was by an OLYIMPIC sprinter at 4.38 seconds.
***SNIP***
Compare apples to apples. If you are going to point to that as the only person to ever run that fast, then why have any mention of 40 times approaching that? If Wilson "truly" runs a 4.4, then that would make him, quite possibly, the second fastest human ever, if you choose to look at it like that. If scouts and coaches use the same methodology to grade recruits on speed, then you can tell who is fast and who falls where. Not necessarily using that number to say he is the fastest person ever. By the 40 times that have been posted for Kenny Wilson at 4.4, he is very fast, and one of the faster recruits of this class. That's pretty much all we can go off of. I think that 4.26 is fudged, just as I think Frantz Hardy's 4.28 was. 40 yard dash times, pretty much take em at face value, not as the gold standard. Conditions of testing, who runs the stopwatch, pads/no pads, track, grass, indoor, etc. I think the fact that Culbert has a listed 40 time of 4.79 or something, and Holt was something similar shows the disparity in the way 40 times are measured. After watching film of those guys, they don't look that much slower than guys who have timed 4.5 or lower. 40 times are nice for bragging rights, but don't end up meaning much.Can't hurt, and it's an interesting read, so HERE IT IS.Do we need the skeleton thread ressurected where it says that the fastest 40 time ever scientifically measured was by an OLYIMPIC sprinter at 4.38 seconds.
***SNIP***
More fuel to the 40 time debate. linkno mention in the post that it was borrowed mostly from the San Diego Union-Tribune. linkCan't hurt, and it's an interesting read, so HERE IT IS.Do we need the skeleton thread ressurected where it says that the fastest 40 time ever scientifically measured was by an OLYIMPIC sprinter at 4.38 seconds.
***SNIP***
Different shoulder. Can he recover? Ahmen had a really crappy sophmore year to come back his junior year and dominate. Remember Jackson has been in the system more than any of the backs.I have no idea I just scratched it down from the interview as fast as I could.Can he ever recover? Is this the same shoulder or are they different. He's a physical back and that's his style....physical back.
Who are you referring to?Had another shoulder operation and will not participate in spring ball again.
brandon jacksonWho are you referring to?Had another shoulder operation and will not participate in spring ball again.
lol! i wouldnt go that far..edit: i guess he has a lot to prove this offseason, last year he appeard lost and didnt know what was happening when there was an audible. he didnt break out until the KU game when his huge return was brought back due to penalty. in the KState game he made some bad decisions in the return game.What do you think Marlon Lucky's time in the 40 is? That dude could be the gamebreaker NU needs. Every time he touched the ball in 05', you just got the feeling that something special could happen. Should be more of the same in 06.