Count 'Bility
Banned
Why did i andmy weight get drug into this?
And saying that people shouldn't be offended by stuff on message boards doesn't mean that people are capable of willfully ignoring what another person says, especially if it's targeting them.But you do mean it coming from a high horse. It's the stance you always take. It's exactly the reason a lot of people didn't like you. Which is their choice, right, who cares (as you have said, you don't).See but that is exactly the problem. One person's actions should not be the determining factor in a change of how the "whole" works. Whether it should or shouldn't, I do realize it won't changeAgreed that people shouldn't take things seriously on a message board, but it only takes one person to commit suicide or have a mental breakdown and have to see a shrink and the family suing the board for causing it and not doing anything about it to shut the site down. Better to be fix the problem early than to wait and maybe have an even bigger problem later.So if cyber bullying is such an issue on the board and we are really concerned about someone on this board committing suicide...eh, nvm...
Thick skin people, it's beneficial to our lives. Suggest heavily on getting some.
If "you" are one of those people who are SO SOFT on a internet message board, and can't take a little razzing, man, yikes.
That is one of the many issues we have living in America. Minority has the power, and its almost always cited as "hurt feelings". It's grossly over exaggerated and ridiculous.
I guess I'm more of a survival of the fittest mindset rather than, protector of the weak...if that makes sense.
I don't mean this coming from a high horse at all but as a genuine question because of our conversations - which do you think Jesus was more like? Survival of the fittest or protector of the weak? Because I see a lot of stories of him interacting with the weak, which is a big part of the reason that the powerful wanted him dead.
Regardless of that hyper-spiritual response, another part of the problem is what you laid out in your previous post where you implied that any male that has emotion or is more easily affected by people's words is less of a man than the guy that doesn't give a sh#t. Which is bullsh#t. You don't know what people have to deal with, you don't know how they were conditioned by their environment, you don't know how they've been scarred and hurt by things completely out of their control. Some people do, indeed, just need to "grow a pair" and get over it, but some people really genuinely struggle as best they can (some people even have physiological chemical imbalances in their brain!) and can hardly help themselves, and then they have you piling on to their battle by saying they aren't manly.
Putting a disclaimer "I don't mean this coming from a high horse" doesn't absolve it. It just makes it completely fake. You wrote what you wrote because you want people to see it. Not because you are genuinely coming to someone's aid or whatever. Look, I get what you are saying, but, don't come at me using all those "pointed fingers" (You's)...like you are some Holy Samaritan. You are just like everyone else.
Good question. Can probably test this easily enough, but I assume not.Quick question...A user can ignore other users and thus not see their posts as much, but does that mean said user will not be able to see any PMs sent by the people on their ignore list?.
Disagree. I also don't think it's even comparable to use depression in the same light as being soft.And saying that people shouldn't be offended by stuff on message boards doesn't mean that people are capable of willfully ignoring what another person says, especially if it's targeting them.But you do mean it coming from a high horse. It's the stance you always take. It's exactly the reason a lot of people didn't like you. Which is their choice, right, who cares (as you have said, you don't).See but that is exactly the problem. One person's actions should not be the determining factor in a change of how the "whole" works. Whether it should or shouldn't, I do realize it won't changeAgreed that people shouldn't take things seriously on a message board, but it only takes one person to commit suicide or have a mental breakdown and have to see a shrink and the family suing the board for causing it and not doing anything about it to shut the site down. Better to be fix the problem early than to wait and maybe have an even bigger problem later.So if cyber bullying is such an issue on the board and we are really concerned about someone on this board committing suicide...eh, nvm...
Thick skin people, it's beneficial to our lives. Suggest heavily on getting some.
If "you" are one of those people who are SO SOFT on a internet message board, and can't take a little razzing, man, yikes.
That is one of the many issues we have living in America. Minority has the power, and its almost always cited as "hurt feelings". It's grossly over exaggerated and ridiculous.
I guess I'm more of a survival of the fittest mindset rather than, protector of the weak...if that makes sense.
I don't mean this coming from a high horse at all but as a genuine question because of our conversations - which do you think Jesus was more like? Survival of the fittest or protector of the weak? Because I see a lot of stories of him interacting with the weak, which is a big part of the reason that the powerful wanted him dead.
Regardless of that hyper-spiritual response, another part of the problem is what you laid out in your previous post where you implied that any male that has emotion or is more easily affected by people's words is less of a man than the guy that doesn't give a sh#t. Which is bullsh#t. You don't know what people have to deal with, you don't know how they were conditioned by their environment, you don't know how they've been scarred and hurt by things completely out of their control. Some people do, indeed, just need to "grow a pair" and get over it, but some people really genuinely struggle as best they can (some people even have physiological chemical imbalances in their brain!) and can hardly help themselves, and then they have you piling on to their battle by saying they aren't manly.
Putting a disclaimer "I don't mean this coming from a high horse" doesn't absolve it. It just makes it completely fake. You wrote what you wrote because you want people to see it. Not because you are genuinely coming to someone's aid or whatever. Look, I get what you are saying, but, don't come at me using all those "pointed fingers" (You's)...like you are some Holy Samaritan. You are just like everyone else.
Saying, "just grow thicker skin," doesn't do a damn thing in solving any problem, because it completely ignores the fact that some people simply can't grow thicker skin. It's along the lines of saying "stop being depressed" to a person suffering from clinical depression.
Who was banned?killer cacti said:Sincerely,
- So you're banning people based on Private Messages? I'd recommend changing the name of them. That whole 'private' thing could throw people.
- It's extremely hard to take a post seriously when it's signed with your handle.
Killer Cacti
P.S. Pretty disappointed with a lot of good posters being banned at once. I will probably be spending a lot less time on the boards.
PoloWho was banned?killer cacti said:Sincerely,
- So you're banning people based on Private Messages? I'd recommend changing the name of them. That whole 'private' thing could throw people.
- It's extremely hard to take a post seriously when it's signed with your handle.
Killer Cacti
P.S. Pretty disappointed with a lot of good posters being banned at once. I will probably be spending a lot less time on the boards.
Disagree. You missed the analogy.Disagree. I also don't think it's even comparable to use depression in the same light as being soft.And saying that people shouldn't be offended by stuff on message boards doesn't mean that people are capable of willfully ignoring what another person says, especially if it's targeting them.But you do mean it coming from a high horse. It's the stance you always take. It's exactly the reason a lot of people didn't like you. Which is their choice, right, who cares (as you have said, you don't).See but that is exactly the problem. One person's actions should not be the determining factor in a change of how the "whole" works. Whether it should or shouldn't, I do realize it won't changeAgreed that people shouldn't take things seriously on a message board, but it only takes one person to commit suicide or have a mental breakdown and have to see a shrink and the family suing the board for causing it and not doing anything about it to shut the site down. Better to be fix the problem early than to wait and maybe have an even bigger problem later.So if cyber bullying is such an issue on the board and we are really concerned about someone on this board committing suicide...eh, nvm...
Thick skin people, it's beneficial to our lives. Suggest heavily on getting some.
If "you" are one of those people who are SO SOFT on a internet message board, and can't take a little razzing, man, yikes.
That is one of the many issues we have living in America. Minority has the power, and its almost always cited as "hurt feelings". It's grossly over exaggerated and ridiculous.
I guess I'm more of a survival of the fittest mindset rather than, protector of the weak...if that makes sense.
I don't mean this coming from a high horse at all but as a genuine question because of our conversations - which do you think Jesus was more like? Survival of the fittest or protector of the weak? Because I see a lot of stories of him interacting with the weak, which is a big part of the reason that the powerful wanted him dead.
Regardless of that hyper-spiritual response, another part of the problem is what you laid out in your previous post where you implied that any male that has emotion or is more easily affected by people's words is less of a man than the guy that doesn't give a sh#t. Which is bullsh#t. You don't know what people have to deal with, you don't know how they were conditioned by their environment, you don't know how they've been scarred and hurt by things completely out of their control. Some people do, indeed, just need to "grow a pair" and get over it, but some people really genuinely struggle as best they can (some people even have physiological chemical imbalances in their brain!) and can hardly help themselves, and then they have you piling on to their battle by saying they aren't manly.
Putting a disclaimer "I don't mean this coming from a high horse" doesn't absolve it. It just makes it completely fake. You wrote what you wrote because you want people to see it. Not because you are genuinely coming to someone's aid or whatever. Look, I get what you are saying, but, don't come at me using all those "pointed fingers" (You's)...like you are some Holy Samaritan. You are just like everyone else.
Saying, "just grow thicker skin," doesn't do a damn thing in solving any problem, because it completely ignores the fact that some people simply can't grow thicker skin. It's along the lines of saying "stop being depressed" to a person suffering from clinical depression.
PoloWho was banned?
ShawnWatson
Abdullah the Butcher
RotoRiot
Dr. Mantis Toboggan
ChaddyBoxer
From page 18 Village of the banned threadNUance said:Is this a complete list? An awful lot of good posters on that list.
Polo
ShawnWatson
Abdullah the Butcher
RotoRiot
Dr. Mantis Toboggan
ChaddyBoxer
tschu
Beanman
LOMs (vacationed?)Still here
sd'sker (supposedly quit)
Carlfense (said he was leaving)
ArmyAllen (said he was leaving)
presidentjlh (might have left)Still here
And also MattyIce (because he's having a hard time fitting in in the Recruiting forum)
kchusker_chris (taking a break, will check back next season)
edit: Updated to reflect StPaulHusker and LOM's inputs, and others
Not any longer. It was set up that way for quite a while.When a person gets banned, are they able to view the site and read posts? Like a visitor/lurker? Just wondered.