huskerfan333157
Starter
You're bringing back memories!!!
You're bringing back memories!!!
I don't refuse to do anything. I'm simply stating, its not because our talent can't draw holds, holds just aren't being called. The Purdue game was a prime example of us getting shafted by officiating. It may not have been intentional, but they didn't call crap on Purdue despite clear holding and they got us on some ticky tack stuff. There was a phantom holding against Stan. I believe a phantom block in the back on a punt return. The roughing the passer was questionable at best. This was just the game I was at. Again, the fix may not be in, but we are on the bad end of poor officiating more often than not.Yet you refuse to mention how we get away with holding, only mention it when it goes against us but not for us.
I don't refuse to do anything. I'm simply stating, its not because our talent can't draw holds, holds just aren't being called. The Purdue game was a prime example of us getting shafted by officiating. It may not have been intentional, but they didn't call crap on Purdue despite clear holding and they got us on some ticky tack stuff. There was a phantom holding against Stan. I believe a phantom block in the back on a punt return. The roughing the passer was questionable at best. This was just the game I was at. Again, the fix may not be in, but we are on the bad end of poor officiating more often than not.
Fair enough as to the specific reddit post not proving anything. My point about the talent thing is there have been obvious holds i.e. gifford against Wisconsin and we still can't get it called. Why this is, I don't know. I error on the side of its not intentional. That said, the officiating in the Purdue game (the only game I've been to in person this season) was bad and Purdue got the benefit of that. How many other times that has happened this season is hard say and the question of how often does this happen to other teams is a fair one. I do find it interesting though we finally get a holding call the same game they bring up the fact we haven't gotten a holding call in 2 years.I think there could be bias against Nebraska. I just think this analysis shows nothing at all, nor do the anecdotes people keep posting. Also, RE: you first sentence, more talented players probably cause the holds to be a lot more obvious.
Here’s a good reply someone on resdit gave: “Some of those graphs are fairly unconvincing if you can, try doing some test so show that Nebraska is statistically different than the rest of the league. (possible i missed these) if you want help with any of this, i might get some time if you send the data over.”
Also, he didn’t look at opp. penalties vs Nebraska compared to their penalties against other teams.
Fair enough as to the specific reddit post not proving anything. My point about the talent thing is there have been obvious holds i.e. gifford against Wisconsin and we still can't get it called. Why this is, I don't know. I error on the side of its not intentional. That said, the officiating in the Purdue game (the only game I've been to in person this season) was bad and Purdue got the benefit of that. How many other times that has happened this season is hard say and the question of how often does this happen to other teams is a fair one. I do find it interesting though we finally get a holding call the same game they bring up the fact we haven't gotten a holding call in 2 years.
Yea its hard not to see it that way. Another consideration I do like to make though is, these refs aren't robots. They have lives and like all of us have bad days and days their performance isn't 100%. It's tough to be a referee. Once you make a decision, the decision is made. No going back and saying you messed that one up 2 plays later. There is little room for error and if you aren't on top of your game it makes things difficult.I am definitely one of the officials screwed us over against Texas A&M people and I was pretty pissed at the Purdue game as well.
This topic (sans any actual figures) was mentioned in another thread recently but I believe the same thing I said there holds true here: it's difficult to draw a succinct conclusion. Is Nebraska unfairly targeted by referees because of their tendencies, does Nebraska simply commit more penalties or is the talent (or lack there of) responsible?
He actually looked at averages for all of the schools in and out of conference play. Now if they want to go into individual games (as I used as an example above), then yes, that's the next logical step for this data. But the overall program and yearly averages do show that the author's initial hypothesis warrants further investigation, as the data (so far) agrees with it.Here’s a good reply someone on resdit gave: “Some of those graphs are fairly unconvincing if you can, try doing some test so show that Nebraska is statistically different than the rest of the league. (possible i missed these) if you want help with any of this, i might get some time if you send the data over.”
Also, he didn’t look at opp. penalties vs Nebraska compared to their penalties against other teams.
Yea its hard not to see it that way. Another consideration I do like to make though is, these refs aren't robots. They have lives and like all of us have bad days and days their performance isn't 100%. It's tough to be a referee. Once you make a decision, the decision is made. No going back and saying you messed that one up 2 plays later. There is little room for error and if you aren't on top of your game it makes things difficult.
I am definitely one of the officials screwed us over against Texas A&M people and I was pretty pissed at them in the Purdue game as well. The score looks lopsided but we were definitely in it at one point when we had a bunch of s#!tty calls go against us.
Folks actually need to sit down and read the data and the post.
—
But the overall program and yearly averages do show that the author's initial hypothesis warrants further investigation, as the data (so far) agrees with it.
—
And no, the data isn't a slam dunk lock, but it does show *something* is amiss beyond just the folks rolling eyes and blaming this on talent alone.
—
But I believe it's reasonable to expect officials to put the effort forth to call a correct game and do their best to remove prejudices from their calls...and the data suggests this isn't happening.
It tries to suggest something is amiss but I'm drawing into question why this is the case, of which the author covers next to nothing. So far as I can tell, the author only vaguely references team talent at one point which, in my opinion, is a significant contributor to penalties for and against. Generally speaking, bad teams get penalized more than good teams. His narrative is pretty clear in that Nebraska is being unfairly targeted. After reading what he said, all I can say is... maybe.The data sets include years in which we had significant talent on the defense. The scope is all years we've been in the B1G--not just the past two or three. Folks actually need to sit down and read the data and the post. The author covers many of the questions that people are bringing up here.
Can there be holding on running plays?
I mean, it's this kind of behavior (among other things) that led to us leaving in the first place...