Well said and I think quite true.Happy 3,333 posts, BTW.Knapp, the vast majority of fans have no idea what Bob was like. If he came back from the dead and coached again, many Nebraska fans would be pooping bricks about 3 games into the season.knapplc said:Hogwash.
They talk about Bo being "Un-Nebraska." FFS, have they never heard of Bob Devaney? And for all of the protestations that Devaney's era was 40 years ago, he was AD as recently as 1993. For a fan base who vividly recalls and frequently references the 1970s and 1980s, that is not that long ago. Maybe to a younger generation, but this isn't a young fan base only.
Out of curiosity, did Auburn "fit into the SEC" last year with lower expectations when they went winless in conference play?
I think Bo's demeanor fits in with the Nebraska zeitgeist far better than people think. We're still a largely rural state, more Blue Collar than White Collar. Maybe not in Omaha (whose media has the least connection to Pelini, not unsurprisingly), but most of the rest of the state. That's not to say Nebraskans are happy their coach said the things caught on tape, or had the petulant meltdown at the presser, but I think much more is being made of that in Omaha and nationally than folks here really care. We care, just... not that much.
Answering some other things said in this thread about the media:
The national storyline about Bo is just as robsker said, "the Poster Child for a childish unsportsmanlike coach." People could maybe quibble with a word here or there, but that's not an unfair or unrealistic description.
It's also tissue-thin. It's a 24-hour news world. Today this is Bo's description. In 2009 it was definitely the media's perception of who Bo was.
In April, 2013 and months beyond, he was the example of all that was right with college football after Jack's Spring Game run. Those storylines change faster than the weather in Nebraska, where today it's 65 degrees and tomorrow tops out at 25.
It only takes one winning season for that storyline to change. Suddenly they'll dredge up the Jack run, the approbations he's received from dozens of former players, he'll be the toast of the town. But even then, he'll be one "chickensh#t" rant away from Bad Bo again.
Is it good to have an overall good reputation, locally and nationally? Yes, absolutely. Do I lose a lot of sleep when that reputation isn't good? For something like tape-gate or the chickensh#t rant, no, not so much.
It's all about the perspective. And that perspective changes daily. Hourly.
The only thing is, for me... even if it may be for a time, I do not like seeing the University of Nebraska viewed poorly. I have lived in 9 states and been a part of 7 universities and while each has its upside, none match up w/ the Nebraska experience. My memories of NU when I was a student there were great and, in a way I cannot quite articulate, the people of Nebraska (in my anecdotal experience) were also great and unique as well. So any sense in which the school and the state I am so fond of is viewed poorly, I am saddened. But, like you, no sleep is lost over it. But there seems to be a simple answer here... get a new coach to be the leader. It looks like we'll have to wait one more year.