Knap, I am sorry that was not what I was saying or trying to. He explained it very well how I feel about it, he just did it nicely. I on the other hand was trying to use numbers and such as that's kind of my thing and what I do alot of this time of year, while going thru last years games. I apoligize for the misunderstanding. But since I am here I will share another number or stat that I come across.I get the impression bigg10 is saying Iowa belongs among the all-time greats. Today, yes. All-time, no.I know they don't compare to Ohio st. or any of those others. Honestly I don't think any Iowa fan on here is saying Iowa deserves to be among the all time greats, not me at least. I do like to see where Iowa sits compared to the elite teams, while under Kirk Ferentz. I do see Iowa in the top third of the big ten, which to most people is pretty good.
Ohio st
Nebraska
Penn st
Mich
Iowa
Wisc
Are the top teams in the Big Ten, besides Ohio st.'s dominance the other school are interchangeable regarding recent success. Ohio st has had our number, Nebraska may as well in the future, but that doesn't mean we are not a top 25 program, because in recent years we are. Nebraska and Iowa are alot alike except for tradition, that is why we compare our program with Nebraska.
I certainly agree with you that Ferentz has your Hawkeyes looking like a worthy opponent on a yearly basis. Hopefully he's beginning to build something lasting in Iowa City. You cannot have too many good teams in your conference.
I won't walk into that Black Friday game without concern. Iowa is a team that can beat anyone on its schedule. But I still expect to win that game. And I think you guys should expect that, too.
Really? They scored 9 points. I don't think our run defense was the problem.Agreed, the second half of the A&M game we let too many yards go. And the entire bowl game. :facepalm:Stopping the run last year would have helped out a lot last year. Hopefully this year, we can live up to stopping the run in a run heavy conference.
9 points was all they needed to win that game. But even games we won, the run defense didn't live up to the expectations of many Husker fans.Really? They scored 9 points. I don't think our run defense was the problem.Agreed, the second half of the A&M game we let too many yards go. And the entire bowl game. :facepalm:Stopping the run last year would have helped out a lot last year. Hopefully this year, we can live up to stopping the run in a run heavy conference.
I wont argue that with you. I do know several players at Iowa are fairly smart and serious about their ed, but overall yes you are 100% right.I have to disagree with you on one of your points. Education is not the top tier in most football athlete's consideration. It is the wins and how far is that program going to take them to the NFL. There are a select few that go to college for the education, but not that many.
If we had scored one more touchdown or two more field goals, that game would be remembered as perhaps the Blackshirts' most brilliant defensive performance of the year. Husker fans weren't satisfied with the run defense because they don't understand the Pelini's defense. The running yards we gave up were the pawns we sacrificed in order to checkmate A&M's king. It worked too - but between our crappy offensive performance and the absurd officiating, we couldn't score more than 10 points.9 points was all they needed to win that game. But even games we won, the run defense didn't live up to the expectations of many Husker fans.Really? They scored 9 points. I don't think our run defense was the problem.Agreed, the second half of the A&M game we let too many yards go. And the entire bowl game. :facepalm:Stopping the run last year would have helped out a lot last year. Hopefully this year, we can live up to stopping the run in a run heavy conference.
OSU will go as far as Braxton Miller (whenever he gets the starting job) takes them. He is a pass first qb but can run very well.Now onto non chest beating football talk. With TP gone, do you expect OH St to run the ball more? I think you have some talent at RB, no more TP and a less experienced qb now. Mabey back to a more "pro set"?
Our Defense hasn't been the problem, but the offense has.If we had scored one more touchdown or two more field goals, that game would be remembered as perhaps the Blackshirts' most brilliant defensive performance of the year. Husker fans weren't satisfied with the run defense because they don't understand the Pelini's defense. The running yards we gave up were the pawns we sacrificed in order to checkmate A&M's king. It worked too - but between our crappy offensive performance and the absurd officiating, we couldn't score more than 10 points.9 points was all they needed to win that game. But even games we won, the run defense didn't live up to the expectations of many Husker fans.Really? They scored 9 points. I don't think our run defense was the problem.Agreed, the second half of the A&M game we let too many yards go. And the entire bowl game. :facepalm:Stopping the run last year would have helped out a lot last year. Hopefully this year, we can live up to stopping the run in a run heavy conference.
Yeah I figured they would go more pro set with some experience behind a new qb. Hows his arm?OSU will go as far as Braxton Miller (whenever he gets the starting job) takes them. He is a pass first qb but can run very well.Now onto non chest beating football talk. With TP gone, do you expect OH St to run the ball more? I think you have some talent at RB, no more TP and a less experienced qb now. Mabey back to a more "pro set"?
I have to disagree with you on one of your points. Education is not the top tier in most football athlete's consideration. It is the wins and how far is that program going to take them to the NFL. There are a select few that go to college for the education, but not that many.
Overall I will agree with that statement.Our Defense hasn't been the problem, but the offense has.If we had scored one more touchdown or two more field goals, that game would be remembered as perhaps the Blackshirts' most brilliant defensive performance of the year. Husker fans weren't satisfied with the run defense because they don't understand the Pelini's defense. The running yards we gave up were the pawns we sacrificed in order to checkmate A&M's king. It worked too - but between our crappy offensive performance and the absurd officiating, we couldn't score more than 10 points.9 points was all they needed to win that game. But even games we won, the run defense didn't live up to the expectations of many Husker fans.Really? They scored 9 points. I don't think our run defense was the problem.Agreed, the second half of the A&M game we let too many yards go. And the entire bowl game. :facepalm:Stopping the run last year would have helped out a lot last year. Hopefully this year, we can live up to stopping the run in a run heavy conference.
The Huskers were 13, I say again thirteen points from being undefeated going into the bowl game. The Defense was and is the reason we're on the precipice of being back to where many of my fellow fans would like us to be. The Offense needs to get its proverbial sh*t together and things will come together.
I'll take a down year anytime where we rank 9th in scoring defense. That's hard to do when your offense doesn't show up for the last half of the season.For all our stars on defense last year, and for all of our lofty rankings in three of the four major defensive categories, we still left a lot to be desired. I would certainly hope that our DEF looks at last year as a "down" year, not as a continuation of the previous year's dominance.
This defense has the potential to be truly great, but there are several guys who need to step up and perform like they've been hyped. You cannot rest on the laurels of your recruiting stars or positive press, nor can you think you've arrived once you've been given a Blackshirt. I think there was some complacence last year that had no place on our team. Let's hope that's gone.