Pedro Guerrero
Team HuskerBoard
This just makes up for the non-catch TD they got in 04. Or the two tackles/blocks by Hicks on their first TD drive. So we can say we are even now.
sure looked like a touchdown to me
- Thread starter ferrisbva68
- Start date
DaveH
Team HuskerBoard
Yea, I don't know if he didn't see that he had posession when he had his other foot down because he was staring down that play.
The touchdown catch was not a catch because he did not have possesion yet. Sure he had the ball in his hands with one foot in, but he had not secured the ball yet. If he takes another step and he is inbounds on drops the ball it isn't a catch. The recieve must secure the ball for it to be a catch and he did not do that until his next step, which put him out of bounds. Read the rule book before you challenge the call, obviously the guy in the booth was thinking the same thing.
I See Red People
All-Conference
I think if it was reviewed it wouldn't have been enough to overturn it. His foot looked like it came off the ground before he secured it.
ttheKid1*18
All-Conference
The touchdown was being juggled imo. They always stop the video when he first gets it, but adjusts it as he goes out of bounds. Even if it is a td though, we win 28-21 though...
BIGREDIOWAN
Mods
:yeah and that is all that matters :thumbs