Tangent Thread - September 2017 Edition

StPaulHusker said:
It is either/or.  They are both good causes.  Why does one suck and the other is "glorious"?
Click to expand...


Because at the root of this discussion are the rivalry trophies and games, and one was foisted upon us with lavish corporate sponsorship, whereas the other came about organically, like how just about all of the successful rivalry game trophies have occurred throughout the ages.

The former is very artificial and the corporate sponsorship, while great for the charities involved, is more about getting good publicity and advertising at the expense of a legitimate rivalry game/trophy occurring. It's too forced, too artificial, too contrived, too sterile. 

The latter is originally the result of people finding humor in our previous coaches' locker room antics. That carried over into a fun, silly trophy whose frivolity was only matched by the snark and humor used to create it. The fact that this trophy came about organically and honestly and couldn't be attached to a corporate sponsorship and ad rights sold is why our AD made it verboten. That it's getting a legitimate charity near and dear to our hearts to help sponsor it is just icing on the cake.

Contrast that with the Heroes Trophy, where if there were no corporate sponsors, it would cease to exist.

 
@StPaulHusker you're being insanely curmudgeonly about this. Agreed upon by everyone, I think. Lighten up dude.

In other news, it's great that the chair is coming back, but of course the only way it could exist is with a corporate sponsor. That's unfathomably lame.

 
Landlord said:
@StPaulHusker you're being insanely curmudgeonly about this. Agreed upon by everyone, I think. Lighten up dude.

In other news, it's great that the chair is coming back, but of course the only way it could exist is with a corporate sponsor. That's unfathomably lame.
Click to expand...
I'm not the one calling people a douche for not getting behind a gag trophy between a mascot and an Twitter parody account.  

That's a Mod doing that. 

 
No, you're not the one doing that. Regardless of that seemingly being said tongue in cheek, and nobody actually being called a douche, you're right - that wasn't you.

You're the one being hyperbolic and looking for something to b!^@h about and disagree with in every single post. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Landlord said:
No, you're not the one doing that. Regardless of that seemingly being said tongue in cheek, and nobody actually being called a douche, you're right - that wasn't you.

You're the one being hyperbolic and looking for something to b!^@h about and disagree with in every single post. 
Click to expand...
There was nothing tongue in cheek about that.  He knew exactly how he was directing that comment.  Anyone else would have had that comment moved or deleted and likely received a message from a mod.  But since he's a mod, oh well.

Sorry that i had to disagree with you there.

 
StPaulHusker said:
I'm not the one calling people a douche for not getting behind a gag trophy between a mascot and an Twitter parody account.  

That's a Mod doing that. 
Click to expand...
Actually, I'm an admin.

 My comment was directed to the administration for hiding the trophy and giving the fans BS answers. And you're taking this entirely too personal. It has nothing to do with you.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
StPaulHusker said:
This is so sad you felt the need to correct me.
Click to expand...
Well since you're gonna base your entire attack on strawman arguments and feel victimized by something that had nothing to do with you, I thought it was prudent to at least set the stage for you to do it correctly.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top