Huskers93-97
New member
True. I just noticed everyone TE we been offering has been 6-5 to 6-7 so he seemed a tad short for what they seem to target
Actually rivals changed it to TE after the reranking. He was originally listed as an athlete fwiwWhat a joke.
That makes a little more sense; they've been higher on him as a LB than as TE.Actually rivals changed it to TE after the reranking. He was originally listed as an athlete fwiw
I actually think he'd be a better LB, but agree that it's crazy to have him ranked like Rivals does.BlitzFirst said:Still is preposterous... All other agencies have him as a top ten TE, Rivals doesn't even have him ranked for TE