huskerenner
Five-Star Recruit
All white captains. Cant wait til Kaepernik gets word of this.
Yeah,he won't stand for it!All white captains. Cant wait til Kaepernik gets word of this.
All white captains. Cant wait til Kaepernik gets word of this.
Yeah,he won't stand for it!All white captains. Cant wait til Kaepernik gets word of this.
Immediately after saying my assumption was wrong he said Tommy was slighted. Why else would southern think Tommy was slighted other than by not getting enough votes (which is exactly what my 8 word reply was about)? That's what the entire thread is about. And I wonder what southern thinks is the reason Tommy didn't get enough votes.So even after see what they say in response you still won't admit that you assumed wrong.We have one person saying the captains aren't diverse and another saying Tommy needs to have a fire lit under his butt (clearly there's something wrong with a QB not named captain!111) because he wasn't made a captain.Is anyone complaining? I see surprise that a fourth-year starting QB wasn't voted captain but I guess I don't see anyone complaining about it.I knew before I opened this thread that some Husker fans would be botching about the choices.![]()
It's okay for you to not care about these comments, fyi. Doesn't mean you need to try to tell anyone noticing them that they're imagining things. Maybe see what the people who made the comments say in response.
But please continue to lecture the rest of us.
I said he was talking about Cook because he was, in fact, talking about Cook, as he explained in Post #27.Immediately after saying my assumption was wrong he said Tommy was slighted. Why else would southern think Tommy was slighted other than by not getting enough votes (which is exactly what my 8 word reply was about)? That's what the entire thread is about. And I wonder what southern thinks is the reason Tommy didn't get enough votes.So even after see what they say in response you still won't admit that you assumed wrong.We have one person saying the captains aren't diverse and another saying Tommy needs to have a fire lit under his butt (clearly there's something wrong with a QB not named captain!111) because he wasn't made a captain.It's okay for you to not care about these comments, fyi. Doesn't mean you need to try to tell anyone noticing them that they're imagining things. Maybe see what the people who made the comments say in response.Is anyone complaining? I see surprise that a fourth-year starting QB wasn't voted captain but I guess I don't see anyone complaining about it.I knew before I opened this thread that some Husker fans would be botching about the choices.![]()
But please continue to lecture the rest of us.
This whole, weird conversation stemmed from you saying he was talking about Cook, even though he said "Tommy" in his sentence and that was the only part I was replying about.
But your reply probably stemmed from thinking my "pay attention" comment was rude which I'll agree to.
Except he doesn't do it all the time. So I don't know what he has to do with it?I'm okay with you trying to argue that, but it doesn't apply here whatsoever. Mavric had just replied to me in similar fashion.I think you should be the HR person for the board. I haven't seen much from you lately that isn't trying to correct someone's response to another.We have one person saying the captains aren't diverse and another saying Tommy needs to have a fire lit under his butt (clearly there's something wrong with a QB not named captain!111) because he wasn't made a captain.Is anyone complaining? I see surprise that a fourth-year starting QB wasn't voted captain but I guess I don't see anyone complaining about it.I knew before I opened this thread that some Husker fans would be botching about the choices.![]()
It's okay for you to not care about these comments, fyi. Doesn't mean you need to try to tell anyone noticing them that they're imagining things. Maybe see what the people who made the comments say in response.
I'm saying Mavric was replying to myself and BigRedBuster similarly, so I don't see the issue in my replying to "someone's response to another."Except he doesn't do it all the time. So I don't know what he has to do with it?I'm okay with you trying to argue that, but it doesn't apply here whatsoever. Mavric had just replied to me in similar fashion.I think you should be the HR person for the board. I haven't seen much from you lately that isn't trying to correct someone's response to another.We have one person saying the captains aren't diverse and another saying Tommy needs to have a fire lit under his butt (clearly there's something wrong with a QB not named captain!111) because he wasn't made a captain.Is anyone complaining? I see surprise that a fourth-year starting QB wasn't voted captain but I guess I don't see anyone complaining about it.I knew before I opened this thread that some Husker fans would be botching about the choices.![]()
It's okay for you to not care about these comments, fyi. Doesn't mean you need to try to tell anyone noticing them that they're imagining things. Maybe see what the people who made the comments say in response.
Maybe I'm still sour from the Illinois game 2 years ago when it comes to you.
Someone: Why are our starters still out there? Illinois is not putting up 24 in 9 min
Moiraine: So we can run up the score and still make the playoffs after we lose our 1st game!
Coach Power'T: Lol. so dumb. I feel so juvenile replying to this but good grief. You know nothing. Seriously.
It's well known that Frazier and Frost weren't captains as seniors.They just said on the radio that Frazier and Frost weren't captains there senior year either. I'm too lazy to verify.
Time to move on for those of you making this something it isn't. This will get more discussion in Nebraska than the number of dead people that vote in PA in November.
I have a crazy memory. For whatever reason that day stuck with me when it comes to you. I'm not sure that's what it was that made me uptight. I think it was a culmination of what you were saying that day. It was a long time ago so I don't remember that specific post being the one to set me off. I thought I was much more harsh than that.I'm saying Mavric was replying to myself and BigRedBuster similarly, so I don't see the issue in my replying to "someone's response to another."Except he doesn't do it all the time. So I don't know what he has to do with it?I'm okay with you trying to argue that, but it doesn't apply here whatsoever. Mavric had just replied to me in similar fashion.I think you should be the HR person for the board. I haven't seen much from you lately that isn't trying to correct someone's response to another.We have one person saying the captains aren't diverse and another saying Tommy needs to have a fire lit under his butt (clearly there's something wrong with a QB not named captain!111) because he wasn't made a captain.Is anyone complaining? I see surprise that a fourth-year starting QB wasn't voted captain but I guess I don't see anyone complaining about it.I knew before I opened this thread that some Husker fans would be botching about the choices.![]()
It's okay for you to not care about these comments, fyi. Doesn't mean you need to try to tell anyone noticing them that they're imagining things. Maybe see what the people who made the comments say in response.
Maybe I'm still sour from the Illinois game 2 years ago when it comes to you.
Why do you remember so far back? That's just weird. I guess I was really annoying that day 'cause I have no idea what you're talking about. I have an argument with someone on here and a month later I don't recall/care and I'm fine with talking to them.
Edit: I had to look. THIS is what you remembered? I disagree with someone and was sarcastic. Not sure why it's such a big deal you still remember it.
Someone: Why are our starters still out there? Illinois is not putting up 24 in 9 min
Moiraine: So we can run up the score and still make the playoffs after we lose our 1st game!
Coach Power'T: Lol. so dumb. I feel so juvenile replying to this but good grief. You know nothing. Seriously.
Not comparable, Cook wasn't a four year starter. It is interesting though.2 offense 2 defense. Your comparison doesn't work.A guy who is suspended over Tommy?
Connor Cook wasn't a captain as a senior either
Cook started for 3 years, so it is mostly comparable.Not comparable, Cook wasn't a four year starter. It is interesting though.2 offense 2 defense. Your comparison doesn't work.A guy who is suspended over Tommy?
Connor Cook wasn't a captain as a senior either
I agree but Tommy is four years. Then again if we have a season like MSU did last year with a non captain senior web I'll take it!Cook started for 3 years, so it is mostly comparable.Not comparable, Cook wasn't a four year starter. It is interesting though.2 offense 2 defense. Your comparison doesn't work.A guy who is suspended over Tommy?
Connor Cook wasn't a captain as a senior either
I agree but Tommy is four years. Then again if we have a season like MSU did last year with a non captain senior web I'll take it!Cook started for 3 years, so it is mostly comparable.Not comparable, Cook wasn't a four year starter. It is interesting though.2 offense 2 defense. Your comparison doesn't work.A guy who is suspended over Tommy?
Connor Cook wasn't a captain as a senior either
If your'e talking about Gerry, isn't the suspension for a bs targeting call in the bowl game?huskerguy said:A guy who is suspended over Tommy?
It's for something that happened during the off season. Gerry's hit was in the first half (barely) so by rule he wouldn't be suspended for the next game.If your'e talking about Gerry, isn't the suspension for a bs targeting call in the bowl game?huskerguy said:A guy who is suspended over Tommy?
No, the Gerry suspension is from a violation of team rules. Gerry's BS targeting call was in the 1st half of the bowl game, so he paid his penalty in that game.If your'e talking about Gerry, isn't the suspension for a bs targeting call in the bowl game?huskerguy said:A guy who is suspended over Tommy?